Comments | gillen: The proof is in the puddingheads

gillen

The proof is in the puddingheads

Mar 02, 2009 18:25

( Read more... )

Comments 7

ghostwes March 3 2009, 02:29:17 UTC

Well, I can't fault your math.

Equally, I suppose: audience = total dickwad(s).

gillen March 3 2009, 02:38:53 UTC

It can then be shown that:

n [Total Dickwad] = [Total Dickwad]

[Total Dickwad] = 0

We can call that ghostwes' Universal Negation Corollary.

latenite_snacks March 3 2009, 03:11:32 UTC

You're welcome.

gillen March 3 2009, 05:27:51 UTC

hmm?

tydestra March 3 2009, 21:24:57 UTC

Stee's exactly the same in person, and he said I believe that I am worse.

The whole thing I hate about dickwads is that they totally kill my buzz while playing online.

substitute March 4 2009, 06:23:38 UTC

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING

joyinthedark March 6 2009, 10:21:01 UTC

As stated, your proof accounts for only the case where anonymity and audience are zero. For other cases, note that if you start with anonymity, and then remove the audience you are left with nothing (Anonymity - Audience = 0).

And we can now make the proportion Maxwell is to Faraday as Gillen is to Harry Dean Stanton ("Ordinary F***ing People: I hate 'em.")