vii;

Dec 08, 2008 19:37



As appreciative as I am of being warned against voting for certain candidates, I would be equally if not more interested in learning of why we ought to vote for those who remain in the running.

That said, if anyone can speak to the qualifications of any of the choices we have been given, do so.

The only position of distinct leadership that this City ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 47

ordered December 9 2008, 01:01:13 UTC
Qualification seems unimportant in their nomination.

Reply

1/2 godsavethequeen December 9 2008, 01:02:26 UTC
Yes, I did notice that much.

Reply

godsavethequeen December 9 2008, 01:03:19 UTC
However, given that we must pick from those presented, I had hoped for some further information on them, despite whatever lack is already obvious.

Reply

ordered December 9 2008, 01:09:44 UTC
Do you believe it's possible for those nominated to fulfil the role, given what's known of them so far?

Reply


adamantined December 9 2008, 01:22:31 UTC
I know one of them is just a kid.

Reply

godsavethequeen December 9 2008, 01:25:57 UTC
Candidate by name of "Death the Kid", or is it another you speak of?

Reply

adamantined December 9 2008, 01:33:08 UTC
Maybe him. The Ichigo kid is my age. We talked about school once.

Reply

godsavethequeen December 9 2008, 01:36:34 UTC
Well I am no one to judge a leader of people by age, but they do seem, from network perusal, a bit volatile.

Reply


invocadora December 9 2008, 02:14:46 UTC
Vote? What is that?

Reply

godsavethequeen December 9 2008, 02:23:36 UTC
What is it for or do you ask what a 'vote' is in itself?

Reply

invocadora December 9 2008, 02:29:30 UTC
Both. I've never heard of such a term before.

Reply

godsavethequeen December 9 2008, 03:41:16 UTC
To vote is a means to issue one's favor in a matter, in this case, of government, for one party, and as a result, against the others. I refer to the warden elections, now being held, likely to end some time tomorrow.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up