St. Eleni, the mother of the Emperor Konstandinos, uncovered the tomb of Christ in Jerusalem. In the subsequent 17 centuries, it has continued to be a site of pilgrimage for Christians.
Yes. Big difference. Only similarity I intended to convey was that there is a history of false claims about finding the "real tomb" of Jesus. Gordon, of course, wasn't trying to subvert the Gospel.
They did a mtDNA analysis on the person in the ossuary marked "Jesus son of Joseph" and on the person in the ossuary marked "Mariamene e Mara" and determined that they were not related. They are making extraordinary and unsupportable claims from little and otherwise unrelated materials.
How about this bit of mumbo-jumbo? "Judah," whom they indicate may have been their son, could have been the "lad" described in the Gospel of John as sleeping in Jesus' lap at the Last Supper.
"One of his disciples, whom Jesus loved, was lying close to the breast of Jesus;" [John 13:23]. Not a "lad," and not "sleeping in Jesus' lap." These people are shameless. I'm offended, less as a Christian than simply as a person with a brain and ethics.
If it's not too expensive, if I ever get to visit Jerusalem I would probably go visit the "garden tomb" too. Precisely because it doesn't have a church on top of it and wasn't vandalized by the Persians and the Muslims. It is probably the best way to get a feel for what it might have looked like back then. Kind of like having a full-scale model: you know it's not the real thing.
I will visit Jerusalem at least once for Pascha. The Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem goes into the Sepulchre to receive the miraculous Holy Fire, which comes out of the rock of the tomb.
The whole tomb is still there. It just has stuff around and on top of it. But it is still accessible. I don't think there's anything wrong with visiting the garden tomb. But it's just a random archaeological site having nothing to do with Jesus.
From what I've understood the outer parts and entrance to the tomb itself have been severely vandalized by both anti-Christian invaders and have not been fully restored due to the extent of the vandalism? I know the "room" of the actual tomb is still there.
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
How about this bit of mumbo-jumbo? "Judah," whom they indicate may have been their son, could have been the "lad" described in the Gospel of John as sleeping in Jesus' lap at the Last Supper.
"One of his disciples, whom Jesus loved, was lying close to the breast of Jesus;" [John 13:23]. Not a "lad," and not "sleeping in Jesus' lap." These people are shameless. I'm offended, less as a Christian than simply as a person with a brain and ethics.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The whole tomb is still there. It just has stuff around and on top of it. But it is still accessible. I don't think there's anything wrong with visiting the garden tomb. But it's just a random archaeological site having nothing to do with Jesus.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment