Comments | gonkulator: Atheistic Debate and tendancies

gonkulator

Atheistic Debate and tendancies

Jan 26, 2009 22:55

Well, tonight, I can't help but write before I go to bed.
I went to This and it was a very lively debate. I think that between the two speakers, the Atheist presented a more convincing argument, not by what he said (because that is ultimately wrong) but because he presented clearly and articulately in an environment that was slightly more ( Read more... )

Comments 3

Well Played! anonymous January 27 2009, 15:52:31 UTC

A concise and clear evaluation of the false assumption in his argument. What we also find in a spiritual evaluation of his argument is juvenile rebellion. I don't want to believe that 2 +2 = 4 just to assert my self. Though the spiritual analysis isn't pertinent to a philosophical debate, it helps us frame our own responses. Its too bad that the d'Souza resorted to ad hominem.

FAD, no longer DAD.

Ascent? anonymous January 27 2009, 21:04:16 UTC

This word "ascent". I don't think it means what you think it means.

Re: Ascent? gonkulator January 27 2009, 23:07:49 UTC

Ah, thank you very much. All Fixed :)