It appeared the battle was part of a systematic campaign against the militia of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, blamed for much of the sectarian violence
( Read more... )
The involvement of Sadr in controlling who was the proposed Prime Minister seems to have been the sticking point over the creation of a government. He seems (rightly) to scare the Sunnis to death. When his preferred candidate was removed, things moved rapidly to a (relatively) successful close.
I find it relatively difficult to see how anyone involved with Sadr is not a terrorist, and it would take a lot to convince me that anything involving them was in any way the fault of anyone else but themselves.
I find it relatively difficult to see how anyone involved with Sadr is not a terrorist, and it would take a lot to convince me that anything involving them was in any way the fault of anyone else but themselves.
Once again, I find that I'm in complete agreement with you.
Comments 2
I find it relatively difficult to see how anyone involved with Sadr is not a terrorist, and it would take a lot to convince me that anything involving them was in any way the fault of anyone else but themselves.
Reply
Once again, I find that I'm in complete agreement with you.
Reply
Leave a comment