(Untitled)

[greck]

HobbesWERK: i really wish there was a visual vlan tutorial HobbesWERK: because i have no idea what "no untagged" (notation untagged) means greck: does that... greck: enable tagging? greck: lol HobbesWERK: so far in these HPs HobbesWERK: i see HobbesWERK: tagged HobbesWERK: untagged HobbesWERK: no tagged HobbesWERK: no untagged HobbesWERK: lol

Comments

[cramer]

no untagged is the opposite of untagged. What you/he left off was goes after the command... the PORT numbers. eg. vlan 42 untagged 11-14. [add ports 11-14 to vlan 42, no 802.1q tags.] The "no" version removes those ports from vlan 42 -- it doesn't make them tagged; it removes them completely. Yes, it's a bit confusing the way HP assigns ports to/removes port from a vlan. I much prefer the Nortel Way(tm) of add and remove -- or provide the complete port list (which can get huge and ugly in a stack.)

I'm certain the people writing the code don't understand VLANs either. That's where the confusing, cumbersome, and otherwise impossible vlan configuration commands come from everywhere.

[PS: this is clearly documented in HP's manual. at least for a 2810]

[mpn]

it removes them from the vlan, so you could do
vlan 1
no untagged

This will ensure all ports are removed from VLAN 1. Not sure what the fundamental methodology the procurve guys are doing with regard to their command syntax. It is different enough from cisco to be annoying but close enough to cisco to be annoying.