eric holder giving us ammunition?

Feb 25, 2014 08:44

Eric Holder has just told state Attorneys General that they do not need to enforce laws they disagree with. His example was gay marriage. But he said something along the lines of "..especially with regards to core constitutional matters." Doesn't this lend credence to the motions by Missouri and other states to end prevention of enforcement of ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

justgoto February 25 2014, 21:14:20 UTC
"..especially with regards to core constitutional matters."
They don't even hide their lawlessness anymore.

Reply


zadok_allen February 26 2014, 00:18:47 UTC
Does he have much of a say in what happens at the state level?

Reply


mrbogey February 28 2014, 00:27:44 UTC
We all know that laws against guns are sacrosanct and must be strictly enforced.

Holder would never back down on a gun case unless it's for his people.

Reply


roadrash1970 February 28 2014, 20:04:26 UTC
He meant to say that States didn't have to enforce any laws that "HE" didn't agree with. Missouri wouldn't qualify on that one. His idea of the Constitution is not that of a valid document but more of a work in progress type of guideline that can be interpreted as they see fit or in many cases, simply ignored.

Reply

fervid_dryfire March 2 2014, 05:04:37 UTC
That mirrors what I thought of it, as well.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up