Point-CounterpointjazzometerAugust 24 2006, 16:04:20 UTC
Weeellll, a nice gesture on Forbes' side, and it's good that they have been forced to revise, but they are a bit disingenuous in not including the slideshow, no? It makes it look like it wasn't that bad of a piece . . . especially to many Forbes' readers (like my asshole rich conservative uncle on the cusp of his second divorce).
Comments 7
we could have written this on the way to Pasta Blitz!
Reply
http://www.feministing.com/
Reply
Man, I wish I could still see his article comparing the economic value of getting married to those of renting a hooker. Wait, no I don't.
Again I have to ask: How does this man have a job?
Reply
http://gawker.com/news/forbes/gawker-cliffsnotes-dont-marry-career-women-196165.php
http://pandagon.net/2006/08/23/cowards-say-we-didnt-say-it-and-even-if-we-did-you-cant-prove-it/#more-3614
Reply
Reply
~ M
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment