shota England/America
anonymous
October 2 2009, 19:14:18 UTC
England teasing his charge, and then America getting himself off rubbing against England's legs/lap while holding his nightdress up on England's instruction so England can watch. England wanting, curious America touching England unsure what exactly to do, and England being exceptionally creepy and possessive over his charge.
Amictus [1/?]
anonymous
October 5 2009, 02:27:42 UTC
Title means: “Mantle” (www.translation-guide.com/free_online_translators.php?from=Latin&to=English) or “clothe with words” (www.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/wordz.pl?english=veil
( ... )
Re: Amictus [1/?]
anonymous
October 5 2009, 02:54:16 UTC
Not OP, but have been anxiously and somewhat nervously hoping for a fill to that hot-and-wrong-as-all-hell request since it came out. And am loving this. I like the way you write both England and America's trains of thought, especially England's. A few typos, but nothing worth mentioning. Please continue soon!
Re: Amictus [1/?], anon!writer
anonymous
October 5 2009, 03:14:44 UTC
Thanks so much. I was debating whether to focus on one or the other, but I'm glad both trains of thought is accepted. ;; I noticed a few typos in the end after posting also, so thanks nonetheless. :)
Re: Amictus [1/?]
anonymous
October 5 2009, 04:13:11 UTC
ohmigoodness. everything is just so warm and cozy and and shota!hot. and i can tell already that this is going to be a completely awesome and sexy fill. i don't think i can tell you how excited i am for more!
now i'm going to go die of shame from loving shota this much
Re: Amictus [1/?]
anonymous
October 5 2009, 19:27:20 UTC
Like anon said, everyone on this meme is a creeper. Anon really enjoyed it, don't worry about posting, with practice you get better, though I think you're pretty damn good already. The kink meme is super good for practice because it is anonymous. No one will know it's really you who messed up.
Amictus [2a/?]
anonymous
October 6 2009, 03:11:54 UTC
Looking up, Alfred notices his guardian's flushed face. “E-Engwand . . . ?”
He looks so damn innocent. England rubs his thumb in a circular motion on the boy's thigh, and leans closer to gaze into the airy cerulean. “Alfred, we are not as colony and empire now; let's use our human names.” Arthur tilts his head near the boy's right shoulder, pressing a kiss near Alfred's lips
( ... )
Amictus [2b/?]
anonymous
October 6 2009, 03:13:39 UTC
“Really?” Alfred's hair is tucked behind his ear. “France didn't visit at all?”
“I-I-I don't know.” Sweat envelops America. Did it really matter if Francis visited? Would England hurt him if he had?
A hand resumes to tease the dress's bottom, occasionally scrapping fingernails on the child's skin beneath.
“You 'don't know'?” A laugh; wicked. “Did he visit or not?” Dark, blunt, punctual; answer me. Arthur sinks deeper underneath the white nightdress, searching for untainted skin to explore and own, while re-positioning the child fully in his lap. The boy's stomach is found and he feathers his fingertips across it, inducing Alfred to recoil into the man's body and glow red once again
( ... )
Amictus [2ab] Notes
anonymous
October 6 2009, 03:14:59 UTC
Note: Alfred is thinking the situation as “America” and “England”, then the others by first names. Arthur as “Alfred” and “Arthur”, then the others by nation names. Can you guess why? *evil* There are also some double-meanings in words.
I did quick research and deducted that Canada was called “New France” under French rule during 1530s-1760s. This is during that period (of America being discovered and still young, before growing as a colony and declaring independence). On that note, apparently underwear wasn't worn till late 1800s/early 1900s. In this story, perhaps England dresses America in them, for some decency? (And my fetish of panties and shota together. Is this alright with OP? :< )
Re: Amictus [2ab] Notes
anonymous
October 6 2009, 08:10:17 UTC
OH FUCK who cares about history anymore?? Moar of this. Please Lucifer, MOAR!! (and anon means this as the highest compliment, this is all kinds of excellent)
Re: Amictus [2ab] Notes
anonymous
October 7 2009, 05:46:05 UTC
Oh my god...this is the LAST kink that I ever thought I would read. Yet I am fascinated with it, absolutely fascinated. Beautiful writing, absolutely amazing detail, and just wonderful at all, though very disturbing at the same time. Seriously, I never thought I would read something like this, yet here I am commenting on how AMAZING it is.
So, I'm joining many of you in Hell. (Not OP by the way)
Am I meeting anyone else in hell?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
now i'm going to go die of shame from loving shota this much
Reply
Reply
Reply
On that note...MOAR PLZ.
Reply
Oh please, please, please continue. Very happy OP here. :)
Reply
He looks so damn innocent. England rubs his thumb in a circular motion on the boy's thigh, and leans closer to gaze into the airy cerulean. “Alfred, we are not as colony and empire now; let's use our human names.” Arthur tilts his head near the boy's right shoulder, pressing a kiss near Alfred's lips ( ... )
Reply
“I-I-I don't know.” Sweat envelops America. Did it really matter if Francis visited? Would England hurt him if he had?
A hand resumes to tease the dress's bottom, occasionally scrapping fingernails on the child's skin beneath.
“You 'don't know'?” A laugh; wicked. “Did he visit or not?” Dark, blunt, punctual; answer me. Arthur sinks deeper underneath the white nightdress, searching for untainted skin to explore and own, while re-positioning the child fully in his lap. The boy's stomach is found and he feathers his fingertips across it, inducing Alfred to recoil into the man's body and glow red once again ( ... )
Reply
I'VE GOT RESERVED TICKETS TO HELL IN A HANDBASKET
WHY IS THIS HOT?
LIKE IM SCARING MYSELF WITH THE WRONG!HOT OF IT ALL!
Reply
I did quick research and deducted that Canada was called “New France” under French rule during 1530s-1760s. This is during that period (of America being discovered and still young, before growing as a colony and declaring independence).
On that note, apparently underwear wasn't worn till late 1800s/early 1900s. In this story, perhaps England dresses America in them, for some decency? (And my fetish of panties and shota together. Is this alright with OP? :< )
Reply
Reply
It's always great when an author does their research.
Reply
Yet I am fascinated with it, absolutely fascinated. Beautiful writing, absolutely amazing detail, and just wonderful at all, though very disturbing at the same time. Seriously, I never thought I would read something like this, yet here I am commenting on how AMAZING it is.
So, I'm joining many of you in Hell. (Not OP by the way)
Reply
Leave a comment