Oh, the rabid Clintonites will say that you're only calling her a lying sack of shit because you obviously think all women are lying sacks of shit...
Oy.
I could tell you who she's starting to sound more and more like, but I'm sure you can guess.
"Oh, well, I didn't mean that we were under literal sniper fire... and by 'run' I really meant 'walk briskly'... and, um... Sinbad's being paid off. Yeah, that's it."
Well...it would seem a COMPLETE FABRICATION is political B-S that we, as a country can do without.
Those of us who see beyond the readiness for this country to have either a woman, or mixed-race (or BOTH!) President, and our own needs to be validated by the 'type' of person in the hotseat have recognized since 1992 that Hillary is NOT the right person to be the first woman President. I'm certain that ANYONE would be better in the role, there are likely many women with more experience and integrity even than Obama, but they will never be 'known' to the world as candidates because they haven't been playing the game.
She's a manipulative game player, finger firmly in the wind.
you knmow, the interesting part of all this is that it's the first time in my voting life where I have cared enough to vote in primaries....
In regards to hillary.... the only reason I'd vote for her would be to get bill back in the white house.... which seems like a dumb-ass reason to vote for someone.... but then again, the only reason anyone is voting for her (other than people who are doing it solely for the fact that she has eggs) is that she had experience being her husband's wife in said capacity.
Comments 5
Oy.
I could tell you who she's starting to sound more and more like, but I'm sure you can guess.
"Oh, well, I didn't mean that we were under literal sniper fire... and by 'run' I really meant 'walk briskly'... and, um... Sinbad's being paid off. Yeah, that's it."
Reply
Those of us who see beyond the readiness for this country to have either a woman, or mixed-race (or BOTH!) President, and our own needs to be validated by the 'type' of person in the hotseat have recognized since 1992 that Hillary is NOT the right person to be the first woman President. I'm certain that ANYONE would be better in the role, there are likely many women with more experience and integrity even than Obama, but they will never be 'known' to the world as candidates because they haven't been playing the game.
She's a manipulative game player, finger firmly in the wind.
Reply
In regards to hillary.... the only reason I'd vote for her would be to get bill back in the white house.... which seems like a dumb-ass reason to vote for someone.... but then again, the only reason anyone is voting for her (other than people who are doing it solely for the fact that she has eggs) is that she had experience being her husband's wife in said capacity.
Reply
I can call her a lying whore, 'cause I have lady parts.
Reply
But I'll keep just being Anti-Hillary.
At this point, McCain would be better (though he's not actively lying as much, he's just wrong a lot...).
Leaving Obama as the natural choice!
I'm certain his skeletons would be pretty easy to find as well, and you know people are looking!
I'm glad I'll never run for office, my skeletons have wardrobes of their own...
Reply
Leave a comment