This is from the Day One post: You must oust two wolves by the end of the third night or the game will end after three days.
This is from the Day Three post: Well, you'll need to get out at least one wolf tonight, or it's an early game over. Think of that what you will.
If there were still five wolves out there, I think the shepherd would have made it much more clear that tonight we'd have to remove two and not "at least one". Otherwise it's too skewed in favor of the wolves.
My thoughts exactly; either Ladd or Haruki was a wolf. I'm confused as to how the suspicion voting went on the second day, though. They seemed to go up, ah, arbitrarily.
Same. I'm leaning toward Ladd, though mostly because of his messy killing method and the number of people left in Day One Group B.
People wasted too much time overthinking the bodies. It was too vague what about them was supposed to be the clue, so by the time Grelle asked the shepherd if there was anything more there wasn't much time left and the votes were already screwy. To me it seemed like a mixture of people going by how they'd vote suspicion-wise if there were no clues, and people voting on someone's killing method. Then, people trying to protect themselves.
Comments 5
This is from the Day One post: You must oust two wolves by the end of the third night or the game will end after three days.
This is from the Day Three post: Well, you'll need to get out at least one wolf tonight, or it's an early game over. Think of that what you will.
If there were still five wolves out there, I think the shepherd would have made it much more clear that tonight we'd have to remove two and not "at least one". Otherwise it's too skewed in favor of the wolves.
Reply
Reply
People wasted too much time overthinking the bodies. It was too vague what about them was supposed to be the clue, so by the time Grelle asked the shepherd if there was anything more there wasn't much time left and the votes were already screwy. To me it seemed like a mixture of people going by how they'd vote suspicion-wise if there were no clues, and people voting on someone's killing method. Then, people trying to protect themselves.
Reply
I have to leave, but I see we've got our new clue. I'll try to be back before ousting and decide then.
Reply
Leave a comment