I don't know about all y'all, but when I opened my email this morning and saw the headline that Obama had won the Nobel Peace Prize, I literally yelped out loud and sloshed my tea all over myself. I know the peace prize has a controversial history, but still... this was a shock.
Now don't get me wrong -- I am a staunch supporter, even though like
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Undoubtedly Obama will disappoint, but at least the Nobel Committee is placing a little pin down right now to place another point on our ideal trajectory. Hell, maybe that's why they've struck early, before he lets everyone down.
At Making Light, one of the commenters points out that the Nobel has been used as an incentive before, with Yasser Arafat, et al. Peace in the Middle East didn't exactly happen, but at least we (assuming that "we" are aligned with the Nobel Committee) are able to say, "this is a goal which should be a top priority."
Reply
I wonder if this will steer his decisions about how to manage the military strategy in Afghanistan. Indeed, I wonder if the Nobel committee didn't have just such a thing in mind. (It would be kind of backwards, but it doesn't seem completely out of the question!)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Back on topic...
I was surprised as well. I didn't realize you could get the prize based upon potential as well as your past efforts, so count me in as the uneducated in that arena. I've also read that Bush was nominated once (although I cannot find a credible source that confirms this) so heck, Obama seems like a better pick to me. :)
Reply
Oddly enough, I had the thought this afternoon that perhaps Obama wouldn't have been awarded the prize if not for his sheer contrast to Bush... i.e. without those last eight years, his election wouldn't have seemed like such a dramatic hopeful turn towards diplomacy, and thus wouldn't have garnered the attention of the Nobel committee in the first place.
But then again, the whole world would be different if we hadn't had W in office, wouldn't it?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment