In research, there are two ways of looking at a project: the hype, and the hangover. Some researchers are really good at hype, and fuel the development of science fiction. Some researchers are really good at giving others hangovers by pointing out obvious flaws. Both approaches are needed, but I find that the former really annoys me.
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
I have grand plans for the future, where this simple model may be enhanced by a rudimentary linguistic model, but there are some serious computational costs involved that I don't think current hardware would be able to handle, even with all of the short-cuts I intend to take.
Reply
I agree that human society follows emergent patterns, created by individuals making locally rational decisions. However, I doubt basic mathematical/computational tools would do a good job modelling the situation well enough to be predictive. It seems highly unlikely to me that you could get this right on the first iteration, or even on the x number of iterations you could reasonably expect to be able to try before the grant money runs out.
But I'm not an expert on this sort of modeling. I suppose no one is yet.
I have ideas about as crazy as this, but I haven't found the energy/guts to clarify them and report them to anyone. Your ideas are an inspiration :p
P.S.: All Hail The Demko. The Demko givith, and The Demko taketh away. Blessed be the name of The Demko.
Reply
What I'm really hoping for is to hit a couple of emergent properties in the same simulation... that would be a first for me. Yes, a lot of tuning will be required, but that's where challenge is.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment