Comments | hotrod: Rules for Threesomes, part one (crossposted on myspace)

hotrod

Rules for Threesomes, part one (crossposted on myspace)

Jul 18, 2007 14:41

As each of us coasts through our life in this bawdy age of excess, glamor, and decadence we will undoubtedly be forced to tackle problems that generations before haven't had to deal with. Issues such as, "will this cell phone give me a tumor," "will Bovine Growth Hormone make me grow udders," or "what was this MDMA cut with ( Read more... )

Comments 13

propopdan July 18 2007, 19:30:28 UTC

I don't know if you wrote this, but if you did, I have an IRL funny story about a foursome that you should include in future installments. for the record, I was not in the foursome (it's hard enough for me to get ONE person in bed with me) , but I am irl friends with three of the four involved. pure gold.

hotrod July 19 2007, 01:10:01 UTC

wrote it myself. can't wait to hear the story.

I approve a_gentle_hill July 19 2007, 00:47:14 UTC

This sounds like protocol developed at a bar.

Re: I approve hotrod July 19 2007, 01:10:45 UTC

nah, just my own fevered thoughts. I guess it's a little lame that even my fantasies have ground rules.

Re: I approve a_gentle_hill July 19 2007, 01:28:56 UTC

Heh, well, if nothing else you've got some things figured out regarding the female mind. I remember mentioning something about threesomes to an ex years ago, and once I did I regretted it. He kept bringing it up and he had this glint in his eye every time... it was too much pressure. As long as we dated, the idea didn't appeal to me again.

Re: I approve propopdan July 19 2007, 05:34:53 UTC

Hey... I'm Dan.

Thread 6

bahia July 19 2007, 12:48:02 UTC

Nice and funny.

But not bad for rules, I think.

I can't wait for the next installment.

angeljargon July 19 2007, 14:17:19 UTC

I'm just eagerly awaiting the rules for threesomes involving a robot. And don't try to naysay that; everyone knows that the iLove robot will totally be one of Apple's awesomer steps in the corporation's quest for benevolent world domination.

hotrod July 19 2007, 14:44:53 UTC

The Three Laws of Robot Sex

as written by Isaac Asimov in 1942.

1. A robot must do whatever it can to get a human off and may not, through inaction, allow a human being be left unsatisfied.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must get its own rocks off as long as such hibbity-dibbity does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

angeljargon July 19 2007, 14:53:42 UTC

So in a threesome setting, if I remember my Asimov correctly, a robot would be required to first attend to whichever human had the highest probability of being satisfied?

It follows that the ladies out there should probably avoid the dubious robot-woman-man threesome.

hotrod July 19 2007, 14:56:17 UTC

Well, one you hope that the second law could be put to good use in this scenario. That assumes an unselfish male lover, and we know how rare those are.