(Untitled)

Jun 26, 2009 08:18

um ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

aircrash June 26 2009, 17:05:03 UTC
.... i like this train of thought.

Reply

that_cat_guy June 26 2009, 17:31:41 UTC
thanks.

Reply


pent June 26 2009, 20:08:43 UTC
It took some careful observation to realize that no, I'm not crazy, and yes, your icon was in fact blinking at me.

In other news -- that's an interesting take. I always thought something similar, but more along the lines of the idea that the house merely reflects the internal state of whomever is inside. The book itself suggests as much, if I remember correctly. When Holloway really starts to lose it, for example, the house becomes monstrous, and it's really the only time we encounter the house being actively malicious.

It does give tremendous opportunities to those within, because essentially they're forced to deal with themselves, in a way that only the house can accomplish: by making a completely internal struggle become a very real and external one. Holloway can't face it, so he becomes homicidal. Both Karen and Navidson force themselves to face it, and they overcome their deepest insecurities and become much, much happier people.

It's like the world's most impossible Rorschach test.

In the end, though, I believe it's the ( ... )

Reply

that_cat_guy June 27 2009, 01:37:47 UTC
that could be too.

Reply


ex_ellimist June 26 2009, 23:10:47 UTC
And maybe it's just a common theme in stories that you've "discovered."

Read Sphere by Michael Crichton.

Reply


ex_ellimist June 27 2009, 17:56:24 UTC
p. 165

"the house, the halls, and the rooms all become the self-collapsing, expanding, tilting, closing, but always in perfect relation to the mental state of the individual."202

Reply


Leave a comment

Up