My abhorrence of group projects is
validated!I've always found that being an intelligent person in a group of do-dos (most of the world) means that if you want to live up to your own standards and principles (or sometimes, if you want to get anything done at all), you end up doing all the work. If intelligent people got to work in groups of the
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
Regardless, group work should never be a veiled attempt at peer tutoring.
Ohsweetjesus you are right. Aaaaaahhhhh. After I left it (thank goodness), my middle school instituted the policy of "No honors classes, because it's better for kids to learn to work with varying ability levels." Which is just about the dumbest idea I have ever heard in my life. And (if I'm recalling things correctly) they expected the smart kids to "help" the slower kids, as well.
I'm going to stop before I stab my eyes out. But in sum: I agree with you.
Reply
Reply
...Learning?
Filling in the dots
Raising standards, wasting time
We are SOL
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
My second-grade teacher was miserable--wouldn't let folks work ahead or anysuch...they segregated by grade level for math (1,2,3) and had a first and two second/third regular classes, of widely ranging aptitudes.
I think it works better for little kids than for actual people...
I never minded group projects--but I was the freeloader problem.
Reply
Reply
adj.
Of, relating to, or constituting an eponym.
ep·o·nym
n.
1. A person whose name is or is thought to be the source of the name of something, such as a city, country, or era. For example, Romulus is the eponym of Rome.
2. Medicine A name of a drug, structure, or disease based on or derived from the name of a person.
i don't get what it means in the context in which you used it.
Reply
Like, the More Capable are kind of the heroes of the eponymously named Capable Of More-Land, or the characters of a book eponomously titled "More Capable", or the joint mayors of their eponomous city Morecapablopolis. The More Capable constitute the eponymously bannered six membered 80's ska sensation More Capable!, and the eponymous More Capable Way is a Roman road built in 367 BC by-- you guessed it-- Emperor Moreo Capablus.
So I guess a group made of people who are more capable would be eponymous, but only if the group were referred to as Team More Capable and not "the more capable group over there."-- an eponymous thing doesn't have to be a proper noun, but it must be particular (eponyms, however, can only be derived from the names of people, like Beethovian or Darcyesque) It's a word so ten dollar that you want to use it all the time, but so precise that it's hard to wait for the ( ... )
Reply
Reply
She labeled the group "The more capable."
"They are eponymously capable of more."
I'm not sure it was 100% right, but it feels right enough to my brain right now and I ain't fightin' it.
Reply
any way you slice it, though, group work in school is incredibly important training for the real world. most jobs involve collaboration. and all those problems you've described apply just as much in the real world. your whole team works on a project for a client, the project sails or sinks, the client likes it or doesn't, and you can't exactly pipe up and say "well i did all the work and had all the great ideas!"
as an aside, i have had professors give individual grades on group projects. i've never had a professor handle this well, though. professors obviously aren't easily able to discern who did what work. i had a teacher in high school who had us fill out peer evaluations after group projects, though i think we all ended up getting the same grade anyway.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment