Those who seek only to survive long enough to reproduce are animals.
Those who seek knowledge, companionship, and better understanding of themselves are people.
Those who seek only destruction are monsters.
That's how I see it. People don't always get along with one another but that makes neither side less of a person. UNLESS THEY'RE SPACE
(
Read more... )
Comments 44
If I try to extend my lifespan by means of survival and to pass on my movepool and skills to the younger generation by the need to bear children, I am considered an Animal.
At the same time, I am here in this particular school foreseeing a better education and cultivating the temple of the mind in order to obtain a higher meaning of life upon myself [aka knowledge]. Therefore I must be People.
But in the same regard, I have seen much destruction and I have been in fights, quarries where my life depended upon it. As well as many meaninghless fights that I had to confront in order to seed my own skillset at the price of destruction of a fellow stranger... In both sport and battle. So I must be a Monster.
So what am I? I have proven to exist on all three tags of yours, but how would you describe my current situation among your annotations?
[OPEN BOOK, TAKE NOTES, THIS IS GONNA BE INTERESTING]
Reply
Reply
I can see that, but what if they are current stages in someone's life? You cannot judge for a Machine can live longer than any of us, organic or extrasensory beings.
You wouldnt understand some concepts, just as reproduction in an organic sense.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment