Cut vs Uncut - the hygiene factor.

[hunterwolf]

There have been numerous debates and tests about whether or not an uncut penis is less hygienic than a cut one

Comments

[raginmage]

I'm always pleasantly surprised when I meet a guy who is uncut. It's like a wrapped Christmas present.

Unfortunately there have been studies showing that HIV transmission in developing countries tends to spread faster because of uncut wangs being the standard.

But here in the US, I enjoy them. :)

[hunterwolf]

The problem I have with these studies is that they do not take the whole equation into consideration. When given a formula of y + x + b = 3c (random example of numbers), these studies take y = 3c into factor...possibly y + b = 3c

[colinstu]

Keep it. I never had one (removed when I was a baby) but I wish I did have one.

That "higher risk of HIV" stuff is BS.

Okay, enough flame bait.

[hunterwolf]

See my reply above ^.^

[pounce_de_leon]

Oh my, I've started something. :-3

[coemgen_brenagh]

Being uncut can be more problematic that just hygiene. I am uncut (at least for the time being), and also diabetic. Being diabetic and uncut is NOT fun. Even with the sugar under tight control and meticulous hygiene, one is prone to yeast infections due to the excess sugar being excreted thru the urine, and if those aren't nipped in the bud as soon as they are discovered, the foreskin may tighten up (sclerosis) and become a bad case of phimosis (swelling of the foreskin). Take it from me, if this last treatment of steroids and anti-fungals (YES yeast is a fungus)doesn't work, I'm going under the knife. Sex should be pleasureful, not PAINFUL!

[hunterwolf]

I stand corrected ^.^ Kinda ^.^ I shall say that cut or uncut is neither more nor less hygienic than the other unless you have something which can affect that part of the body.