I'm at a complete loss to understand where you got that idea from. I just don't like how politicians and the media are stoking the fires of unrest with high ideals to anger the powers that be.
A calm and firm leader will be able to handle an angry crowd, but angering him will create a disaster. The obvious solution is to assist in calming the crowd, instead all the media and politicians have done is made things a lot worse than they needed to be by angering the leader. It's insane how they claim to be on the side of the people, when clearly their actions have had the opposite consequence and put them in danger. It frustrates me seeing this sort of situation between people, politicians, and media happen time and again.
Comments 2
(The comment has been removed)
A calm and firm leader will be able to handle an angry crowd, but angering him will create a disaster. The obvious solution is to assist in calming the crowd, instead all the media and politicians have done is made things a lot worse than they needed to be by angering the leader. It's insane how they claim to be on the side of the people, when clearly their actions have had the opposite consequence and put them in danger. It frustrates me seeing this sort of situation between people, politicians, and media happen time and again.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment