will it ever end?

[sidhex3]

*splutters in frustration* tell me, does anyone really agree that these are textures?

Comments

[organza]

rofl.

[supersyncspaz7]

Oh HELL no.

[wickedgrdn]

UM NO.

Actually they look more like fugly icon bases than textures. O.O

[karlakaine]

IAWTC.

[wickedgrdn]

hee, lol. ;)

[sidhex3]

oh yeah, seriously fugly. to give the person the benefit of the doubt, they do appear to be new to the whole resource making thing and in need of a few pointers.

[rabidfangirl67]

:( They fail for using low quality pictures to make bases. And, for posting them in a texture community.

[sidhex3]

as we've talked about above, i can forgive the low-qual images....newbie to resource making. as for posting them in a texture comm....the mods there shouldn't have approved it either (it's moderated posting).

[lookslikerain]

Well, IMHO anything that adds texture to an icon is technically a "texture". I know I have used some pretty strange things on an icon to get a particular effect.

That doesn't mean I don't find those ugly as sin. Because yikes!

[sidhex3]

i'd love to see someone try to use one of those as a texture. ;)

[theluvbox]

Well, IMHO anything that adds texture to an icon is technically a "texture". I know I have used some pretty strange things on an icon to get a particular effect.

I agree with this. I take pictures and shots of the weirdest things and use them as textures. It's a fun process as well.

This reminds me, I have to empty my camera.

[sidhex3]

well, if you have a read of the comments on the person's website, they explain to another person that the 'textures' are meant to be used as icon bases.