Further Confusion

Jan 26, 2010 14:39

Overall, Con gets a meh. Just wasn't into it this year. Probably due to the new hotel, and due to certain people not being able to make it. And completely missed seeing a few people ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 18

soldierx January 28 2010, 04:46:17 UTC
Hrrrr I'm con staff get on the sidewalkz Durrr. Um yeah con ovar, we do what we want. I would have given him a chuck norris roundhouse for the lulz.

Reply


thespaniard84 January 28 2010, 21:39:14 UTC
Wow it sounds like he might lose his RL job over this. What he did was all kinds of retarded fucked up and wrong, but it seems like some self-righteous furries are sending links to his FA account and BeastForum account to his employers as an act of vengeance. That is really stepping over the line guys, what the fuck is this death sentence for jay walking mentality? He should be absolutely removed from con staff for what he did, not lose his completely unrelated RL job in an economy like this. There is a proper amount of anger to have but, FUCK furries can be cruely vindictive.

Reply

icywolfy January 28 2010, 22:05:46 UTC
He probably won't lose his job over this, when I knew of others working there, all the staff just considers him strange, creepy and someone to avoid -- He does his job, but definitely has social-life issues. That and the fact that non-furs there referred to him as 'Frosty' as well… um, that caught me off guard.

Though, it's still in bad taste for whomever is forwarding not-explicitly public links to his FA acct over to his employer (if they'll even give it heed, if sent anonymously).

Reply

thespaniard84 January 28 2010, 22:08:25 UTC
Frankly the fact that they are letting his employers know that he took photos of animal cocks at Sea World while working there and posted them on a bestiality forum really puts his job in jeopardy.

Reply

icywolfy January 28 2010, 22:36:53 UTC
... Now _that_ is something that probably shouldn't have been said outright. Every fur that knows him knows of this behaviour, (and really, most of us don't care enough to report this flagrant violation of policy there)

But in short, he's partaking in behaviour that falls under "just don't get caught". I wouldn't personally out someone (in the hopes that should I ever do something underhanded, I'll be given a blind eye by those who know)

(and LJ should really let people editing replies (shouldn't really have the act, nor the employer name just out there for google to catch)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up