And no, I was trying to define the Soul, BY defining things related (IF they really are related) to the Soul, in order to come to a conclusion as to wether the Soul is any of those prementioned concepts.
There is very little emotion attached to the Soul. Emotions are controlled and under the whim of the host person. Emotions do not run amok except within the weak.
The definite Soul is clearly beyond the full understanding of any Human. In my opinion, the Soul is more complex than the entire Cosmos.
And a broken Soul is, indeed, a very dangerous thing.
For the same reason you think you should question religion.
Some aspects of religion are beyond understanding, and yet you question them. And for the same reasons, they should not be questioned. That IS religion; faith.
Comments 3
(The comment has been removed)
I expected a bit more from you.
And no, I was trying to define the Soul, BY defining things related (IF they really are related) to the Soul, in order to come to a conclusion as to wether the Soul is any of those prementioned concepts.
There is very little emotion attached to the Soul. Emotions are controlled and under the whim of the host person. Emotions do not run amok except within the weak.
The definite Soul is clearly beyond the full understanding of any Human. In my opinion, the Soul is more complex than the entire Cosmos.
And a broken Soul is, indeed, a very dangerous thing.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Some aspects of religion are beyond understanding, and yet you question them. And for the same reasons, they should not be questioned. That IS religion; faith.
If you question, you have no faith.
Reply
Leave a comment