Energy doesn't really exist, it's a word to describe an abstraction. o.O
PS: I am impressed you mentioned the information field, especially by its name...
Before I awoke, I asked a great many questions about how the universe really functions, using the old logics (physics, mathematics, dimensionality (space-time)), and as my one answer I received that same conclusion from the universe that answered many of my questions: the spinning disc of akasha.
Furthermore, I think what Jung missed and what you specially hit upon here, whether in jest or not, is that we are doing it all backwards.
We assume matter propels the psychic fields, whereas ironically it is more likely that the psychic fields propel matter, whereas the universe itself is a manifestation of this.
It is even more likely that neither or both simultaneously is the case.
Yes, I like both simultaneously. In the astro idiom, Mercury rules Gemini and Virgo - where Virgo is the more substance-like aspect of the mind, the vessel of containment which plays teleonomic counterpoint to he Geminian teleology. Our brain knows things we don't.
Yes, and our body knows things our brain does not.
When I was in New Zealand I mused at the jungle of flora, and thought about a science article I had read about how plants communicate with their own pheromone trails, like animals.
Then I realized that these strange, alien things that we take so much for granted may very well be the ganglia of a global mind. Their breath, the synaptic cleft of a different, collective consciousness.
Loved the Parallel Lines. I hope Einstein's right and we all eventually meet Debbie Harry.
If Matter is really only energy slowed to a crawl
Hmm. Bumps up against the nature of space-time. Whatever matter and energy exist IN, is it the same, or not? Because otherwise I can't go with you here. Space-time being a constant, matter can't be energy slowed down. Unless you want to propose another curvature of space-time, one we can't yet see with the help of, say, an eclipse, some curvature that defines energy as sometimes slowed-down matter, sometimes just energy, depending on where? Would you agree that for you to be right about matter relative to energy, we have to find a way for space-time no longer to be a constant
( ... )
Coo. More validation for my view of the correspondence of electromagnetism to "Water" (gravity = Earth, strong force = Fire, weak force = "Air") I think.
Comments 29
Energy doesn't really exist, it's a word to describe an abstraction. o.O
PS: I am impressed you mentioned the information field, especially by its name...
Before I awoke, I asked a great many questions about how the universe really functions, using the old logics (physics, mathematics, dimensionality (space-time)), and as my one answer I received that same conclusion from the universe that answered many of my questions: the spinning disc of akasha.
Reply
We assume matter propels the psychic fields, whereas ironically it is more likely that the psychic fields propel matter, whereas the universe itself is a manifestation of this.
It is even more likely that neither or both simultaneously is the case.
Reply
Reply
When I was in New Zealand I mused at the jungle of flora, and thought about a science article I had read about how plants communicate with their own pheromone trails, like animals.
Then I realized that these strange, alien things that we take so much for granted may very well be the ganglia of a global mind. Their breath, the synaptic cleft of a different, collective consciousness.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Loved the Parallel Lines. I hope Einstein's right and we all eventually meet Debbie Harry.
If Matter is really only energy slowed to a crawl
Hmm. Bumps up against the nature of space-time. Whatever matter and energy exist IN, is it the same, or not? Because otherwise I can't go with you here. Space-time being a constant, matter can't be energy slowed down. Unless you want to propose another curvature of space-time, one we can't yet see with the help of, say, an eclipse, some curvature that defines energy as sometimes slowed-down matter, sometimes just energy, depending on where? Would you agree that for you to be right about matter relative to energy, we have to find a way for space-time no longer to be a constant ( ... )
Reply
Reply
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16100-electron-strobe-turns-atoms-into-movie-stars.html
The slowest video ever taken of "atoms". Check it out.
Looks to me like, gasp and shock, waves, ripples on a lake, oscillating just like they do "up" here.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment