I was interested in the idea that 'war drives technological innovation'. It certainly drives military improvements, and those can sometimes carry over in civilian life but I think that it's a mistake to assume that violence or even competition itself is beneficial to humanity as a whole in any sense, particularly going forward. Competition is great
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Another interesting point is that the way we fight war is so limited. There is no necessity of lives being lost, save that we give this aspect to war when we go about it.
If only we could somehow trick ourselves into that bio-survival anxiety state that is the peculiarity of war, which allows so much progress to be made--but without all the dangerous infringence upon our survival as a species and us as brothers and sisters of the same blood?
Reply
Meaning that its fueled by population quantity. More people means more technology will be created to sustain the whole. The greater the whole, the greater the work that can be done, the more efficient the work becomes.
While everyone screams, "How will we support 20 billion people?!", the powers that be will be bringing us goodies like artificial intelligence, meat grown in labs, new forms of movement and habitation (why live horizontal when you can live vertical, why run when you can fly, blah blah).
Some of humanity's greatest gifts are given by the universe to certain individuals. Like Tesla and his motor. If humans can't pick up the slack to fill the void in forward moment, it appears that the means will be provided anyway.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment