General ponderings.

Feb 28, 2008 11:47

I've been thinking about this, and I'd like to get other people's thoughts. I haven't seen a good LJ discussion in a while ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 4

doxamully February 28 2008, 19:55:33 UTC
I think it depends and of course it's different for everyone, but generally waiting a while is a good idea. I think this is especially true if someone started dating someone they didn't know beforehand. I've heard too many horror stories to think that getting married to someone one knows for only a month to think that's a good idea!

I personally think at least a year is reasonable, but probably even longer than that. Of course living together first is a good idea because it gives a good sense of what's to come. The way I figure it is, what's the hurry? Two people can be happy together without being married and that way if things go sour, there's no need for the legal uglies of a divorce.

Reply


jackalopemonger February 29 2008, 00:47:57 UTC
Depends on the couple and the relationship, but at least long enough for the euphoric hormones to wear off. (Takes between 8 months to 2 years.)

Reply

imclala February 29 2008, 00:55:21 UTC
A scientific approach. Interesting.

What about those couples who swear they are madly, passionately, euphorically in love after 20 years of marriage?

Reply


mukudori February 29 2008, 17:43:59 UTC
I think you need to field test living together for at least 1-2 years. Also, people under 25 are still undergoing a formative process and can change rapidly. This happened with a friend of mine, she got married after less than a year of dating, and got divorced after less than a year of marriage.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up