Nov 09, 2004 15:17
I wonder if the real movers of this world played well with others when they were young. Did they share, or did they stake a claim to what was theirs and defend that claim?
Would definitely be a fun child psychology project. Hmm, i wonder if there's any data on this now. Time to research.
Leave a comment
Comments 5
For instance, I share my chocolate with others. But come dinner-time, I'm reluctant to share my Pad Thai. It's not necessarily a matter of germs, just a matter of MY FOOD. :-D
Bear in mind that analyzing children probably wouldn't be a good test, since they are evil little pissants who can't even talk right.
Reply
I'm pretty sure that as people in general, the movers and shakers have been, during their lifetimes, considered totally insane, unpleasant, unsociable, etc. Even when we examine their lives today, we tend to forgive the bad things they did -- take Dickens, for example. It's just the way they're remembered that makes them "great people".
Specifically about childhood, I'd think that some behaviors probably did begin to manifest themselves at that point, just because of normal psychological development. You'd have to study the influence of their parents and environment, which probably also had bearing on their later vocation, &c, &c. Did a future scientist behave the same way as did a future novelist? What were the circumstances that led them to those professions?
What specific people did you have in mind?
Reply
But you extended the initial reach of my post quite well. What would be the difference in behavior between a physicist , an innovative businessman, and a novelist? And how does this fall back in line with my initial question? Which might generally possess a more selfish attitude?
And to take that a bit deeper, i wonder to what extent these children tend to be punished for their selfishness, if indeed they do have a stronger sense of self interest than the average whiny brat.
My general hypothesis is that some children, for whatever reason, are generally more selfish than others, and if left alone enough for that selfishness to develop (and checked enough so that they don't become ( ... )
Reply
Reply
~s
Reply
Leave a comment