Update: Religiously motivated child abuse A-OK according to LJ

[dogemperor]

Roughly a month or so ago, I wrote an extensive article in regards to two communities on LJ which promote religiously motivated child abuse--specifically trainupachild which promotes the works of the Pearls, Tedd Tripp and Bill Gothard, and babywise which promoted the work of the Ezzos

Comments

[astraea_trepe]

There is such a disgustingly obvious double standard in how these complaints have been treated and what's been said about how fanart will be treated. They are perfectly willing to get into a friends-locked post of fanart based on anyone's complaint, but for anything else they look at the profile first!?

[emcyclopedia]

They are perfectly willing to get into a friends-locked post of fanart based on anyone's complaint, but for anything else they look at the profile first!?

IAWTC.

LJ, this is getting ridiculous. So apparently, fanart with "kiddies" in them vs Bible-based child abuse. Fanart is more important-- yeah, for their image.

[nleseul]

Ah, okay. So encouraging people to harass or physically harm particular individual kids is okay, as long as you're not encouraging anyone to harass or physically harm particular groups.

I guess that makes sense, at least in the magical parallel dimension of Whatthefructose.

[hoshi3]

The hole gets six feet deeper!

NPR did a story today on sneaking in advertising on Facebook

[speck]

They asked about making changes to the TOS and informing users and the person being interviewed (from Advertising Age) blew right by the question.

NPR is getting a note from me about it, and mentioning the ad-mess and other messes here.

[thevelvetsun]

Time to go to the press.