During my research proposal presentation, Professor Jules stated that she disagreed with my perspective of ethics. She suggested every person is, to a degree, blind to the ideological hegemonies that dictate their perspective of ethics in a situation. I’d never thought about the unconscious dimension before
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
I'm not sure that's a problem, if you are saying that it is a problem.
Reply
Thanks for the thoughts. I'd love it if you could recommend me a good book on ethics.
Reply
for this young christian, what if he feels God has placed the calling of acrobat on his life - then do you honor God or honor your parents who desire for you to be boring and wealthy?
Reply
..and then just to make this excercise really annoying, what if his/her parents also believe God wants their child to have a safe job?
Makes me want to run away to the circus just to avoid thinking about it!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reading recommendations:
Louis Althusser, 'Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses', in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essay;
Terry Eagleton, Ideology, an Introduction;
Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act;
George Lictheim, The Concept of Ideology and Other Essays.
Ironically, a few of these are oblivious to their own ideology, particularly because Marxism has long used 'ideology' as a pejorative term for the state-sponsored, oppressive set of ideas against which loyal Marxists struggle For The Good Of The People. Marx was also quite blind to his own prejudices in his writing.
The easy way to spot ideological influence is in value judgements. As soon as anyone says or implies that anything is good or bad, a value judgement is being made, which means that the thing in question is being compared with a set of ideas about what is right.
Can we rightly assume to ( ... )
Reply
I'll check out those books. Value judgements sounds like a pretty good category to look for when seeking out a person's values. I suppose it would follow that the generalisations and assumptions a person casually makes about social and political events or actors might also expose the unconscious idealogies floating around.
Interesting point about some Marxists' tendency to consider themselves untarnished by dirty hegemonic idealogical bias. My feeling is a slightly different (but in effect similar) thing occurs in some Christian circles, namely the "I don't have a bias, I just follow the Bible" variety of blindness that I hint at above. I'm going to be thinking all day about different communities and their relationship to idea of idealogy/cultural bias. Will communities who view bias as negative, be more prone to blindness of their own values?
Most importantly, what values do I have that I'm largely unaware of? now there's a question worth asking.
Thanks again
Reply
Another feature of this, which you may or may not have run into, is the relative visibility of alternative views. This works (unsurprisingly) in much the same way as the relative visibility of everyone else's cultural behaviours, as opposed to one's own: most people are far more aware of ideas with which they disagree than ideas with which they agree (because the latter seem to be 'natural' or 'common sense'). On this basis, a group who view bias as negative will generally view others' biases as negative, while remaining unconscious of their own.
I really should shut up now. Ideology is what I study all day, every day.
I am very glad to have the opportunity to speak with you again (having spent quite a while trying to remember your lj username).
Reply
Oh wait, after a quarter of a century she decided to go to drama school anyway!
N xx
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment