Criticism often feels like a personal attack. As a result, most people become defensive when criticized and will stubbornly defend their idea even if the criticism has merit
( Read more... )
There is a certain amount of tact when it comes to criticism.
I agree that tact is important when criticizing art, as you mention. Such criticisms are based upon extremely subjective standards (aesthetic norms). I dislike the notion that there's some obligation for people to use tact when criticizing ideas, however, since these criticisms are based upon fairly objective standards (epistemic norms). Criticism is a charitable gift of thoughtfulness. There's no reason to be offended at criticism of ideas if you don't hold the egotistical belief that you actual chose your own beliefs (as opposed to them being socially imposed). So, I don't feel that there is any reason to use tact in criticizing ideas just as there is no reason why a person who gives food to charity is obligated to also donate utensils to eat the food. It is the philosohpically vulgar beggars who cannot be choosers, and they'd damn well better appreciate any scraps that fall their way lest critics revoke their gift in spite.
Yes, society may have a huge influence, but there's a certain amount of one's own thought that determines what's personally acceptable vs what's complete and total bull.
Personally acceptable? I differentiate beliefs from values. When someone is stating a value, I see no objections and any criticism calls for some tact. When someone is stating a belief, as in an idea, I scrutinize carefully and don't see the need for tact.
Christians continually criticize Wiccans, claiming their beliefs are "of the Devil," but fail to acknowledge the similarities (or when they do, claim absurd reasonings for them). Does it accomplish anything? Generally, no.
The goal to be accomplished in criticizing is thoughtfulness, a critical consciousness. When religious groups criticize each other they provoke thought and argumentation, which is good. It's not as if failing to see similarities or failing to criticize empathetically makes the goal any less accomplished.
The point is, nobody can really criticize another person's beliefs without, in some way,
( ... )
Comments 2
(The comment has been removed)
I agree that tact is important when criticizing art, as you mention. Such criticisms are based upon extremely subjective standards (aesthetic norms). I dislike the notion that there's some obligation for people to use tact when criticizing ideas, however, since these criticisms are based upon fairly objective standards (epistemic norms). Criticism is a charitable gift of thoughtfulness. There's no reason to be offended at criticism of ideas if you don't hold the egotistical belief that you actual chose your own beliefs (as opposed to them being socially imposed). So, I don't feel that there is any reason to use tact in criticizing ideas just as there is no reason why a person who gives food to charity is obligated to also donate utensils to eat the food. It is the philosohpically vulgar beggars who cannot be choosers, and they'd damn well better appreciate any scraps that fall their way lest critics revoke their gift in spite.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Personally acceptable? I differentiate beliefs from values. When someone is stating a value, I see no objections and any criticism calls for some tact. When someone is stating a belief, as in an idea, I scrutinize carefully and don't see the need for tact.
Christians continually criticize Wiccans, claiming their beliefs are "of the Devil," but fail to acknowledge the similarities (or when they do, claim absurd reasonings for them). Does it accomplish anything? Generally, no.
The goal to be accomplished in criticizing is thoughtfulness, a critical consciousness. When religious groups criticize each other they provoke thought and argumentation, which is good. It's not as if failing to see similarities or failing to criticize empathetically makes the goal any less accomplished.
The point is, nobody can really criticize another person's beliefs without, in some way, ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment