В википедии есть статья под названием "
Принятие григорианского календаря", в которой подробно расписана история принятия этого календаря в разных странах на протяжении последних четырех с половиной столетий, "с 1582 года". Статью возглавляет изображение, подписанное как "
Lunario Novo, Secondo la Nuova Riforma della Correttione del l'Anno Riformato
(
Read more... )
Comments 57
Reply
Кроме того, как отмечают некоторые исследователи, эти академики МГУ и сами тоже не проч заняться вбросами и фальсификатом.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
> in different periods of time? like spaces before punctation
Reliable information - probably nowhere. You can use the official information, but take into account the incorrect dating in this version.
It should be taken into account that special forgeries were fabricated with this ancient form of recording, artificially creating antiquity. For example, this is most likely an authentic antique record, just incorrectly dated:
( ... )
Reply
and the monks made also mistakes, like in the book with 30 February
Monks .. they were the first to create a lots of things, like cheese, beer and of course the first to run printing ateliers
IMO Forgeries regarding "antiquity" starting around 1750 and the 1800s were the peak. It's still ongoing, but nowadays at a much lower rate and speed. THEY achieved their goal anyway, THEY rule and who questions it? Who cares about that?
PS .. How did you do it to insert the pictures in your comment? I can't see any possibility :-(
Reply
> were the peak. It's still ongoing, but nowadays at a much lower rate
> and speed. THEY achieved their goal anyway, THEY rule and who questions
> it? Who cares about that?
Me. I've started compiling a database of forgers. It's an open project, if you want to add someone, contribute to project, i'd be happy to: https://is3.soundragon.su/fdb/
> PS .. How did you do it to insert the pictures in your comment? I
> can't see any possibility :-(
I use the standard hmtl code to do this:
( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment