Spirituality

Sep 02, 2007 14:15

Okay, I've got a question about spirituality and gender. It's probably a bit random, but that's what happens when I spend too long doing essays on English Literature.

Excerpt from A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 32

stubefied_by_gd September 2 2007, 14:26:14 UTC
Maybe men see spirituality in women and women in men? I don't do the muse thing, so I can't help you there. Weren't all the original Muses female? I think that's how it was in the Disney movie... You know I'm pretty traditionally religious, and I'd say the focus of that is male, athough not necessarily masculine... But then I realized that the Virgin Mary is very popular, too. We get in hot water because it sometimes seems she's elevated to an esteem that God clearly says isn't for anyone but Him. Maybe because some people do have a need to associate spirituality with the feminine?

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 17:04:19 UTC
Maybe men see spirituality in women and women in men?
Aye, that was pretty much what I was shooting at. It's one of the problems I have with Jung labelling spirituality as pretty exclusively female.

But then I realized that the Virgin Mary is very popular, too. We get in hot water because it sometimes seems she's elevated to an esteem that God clearly says isn't for anyone but Him. Maybe because some people do have a need to associate spirituality with the feminine?
It's fascinating you bring this point up when I'm discussing Joyce. The dude, Stephen, worships the Virgin Mary to a huge degree, and she's in a lot his imagery. Even when he turns away from the Church, he seems very drawn to the idea of her.

You know, it kinda bothers me that such a big deal is made of the virgin aspect, actually. I mean, of all the virtues a human being can have, not-having-had-sex is the one we praise in a woman? Hm.

Reply

stubefied_by_gd September 2 2007, 17:40:15 UTC
You know, it kinda bothers me that such a big deal is made of the virgin aspect, actually. I mean, of all the virtues a human being can have, not-having-had-sex is the one we praise in a woman? Hm.
I think Catholics are the only ones who cling to her being "ever Virgin," and that probably came along during one of our particularly repressed historical periods. It was a big deal in the Bible that she was a virgin, obviously, to make it clear that the baby must have come from God. But I thing a number of Christians believe she went on and had a proper family with Joseph ( ... )

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 18:03:47 UTC
Us crazy Catholics, huh? It does big me a little, but ah well, no biggie. I'm sure you're right about your evolutionary analysis. Interesting stuff.

Reply


prplhez8 September 2 2007, 15:20:39 UTC
Heh! Good questions and thoughts, J. And I shall add my ramblings to it.

I've always considered my muse male, honestly. I identify better with the male characters, at least in the world of HP and in the real world. Nothing against my gender, I just don't identify with A LOT of them.

As for spirtuality...I think it's all in the eye of the beholder. Some people's spirituality is a firey and emblazened thing that might be likened to a warrior more than a woman. But for other's it is more ethereal and fleeting, so it would/could be likened to a woman. Then again, there have been bold and firey women, and softer, gentler men. So, again it's just me, it might be in the eye of the beholder.

Just my two knuts. :)

~ Hez

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 17:08:00 UTC
Yay! I adore your ramblings. You have no idea how cool I think it is that you have a male muse. Do you know what you kinda identify with in men? I've always thought of you as pretty tough - so that might be part of it? But don't let me override your answer with my ponderings. :)

Hee. It's funny, but if I identified with a fiery and emblazened thing, it would definitely be a woman. That's part of why I identify with Ginny so much - she's a bit of a warrior. I just wouldn't associate fire with man. Obviously that's just my personal thoughts, so it's fun how that can be different.

Reply

prplhez8 September 2 2007, 17:24:08 UTC
I've always thought of you as pretty tough - so that might be part of it?
a;lskfjdals;fjdla;ksfjdalskfjdlasfjd

You're so funny. Yeah, I think of myself as tough, but I also have a very very mushy and gushy soft side as we've often discussed, I tend to lead from the heart.

And as for fiery and emblazened being a woman, I think I mentioned that above, also. And yes, we all know your love of all things Ginny. :P

As for my male muse, I would think of him as having a soul of a poet, he would definitely be much more like Moony than anyone methinks. But that's just me, again.

Hee! This is a fun topic. Go you!

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 17:29:58 UTC
Why'd you laugh, huh? You are pretty tough. I wasn't saying you can't be plenty girly and heart orientated as well.

And as for fiery and emblazened being a woman, I think I mentioned that above, also.
You certainly did. I was just thinking about my own thoughts. I sure weren't disagreeing with yours. Hee. Ginny-love rocks.

Do you know, I know a couple of women who identify with men because they are simpler. I'm not sure how to relate that back to spirituality, though...

Reply


stmargarets September 2 2007, 16:01:11 UTC
I think women are given that distinction because men were the ones writing. Spirituality - a muse - those are mysteries that come from within. If the 'without' is a male - than the other part that makes him whole is the female part of him that resides inside. The two genders are used to show separation and wholeness over and over again in symbology.

That being said, I don't think of my muse as a person - it's more like a fountain or a well that yields what I need. (And I frequently have to go looking for it again! :))

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 17:12:49 UTC
I think women are given that distinction because men were the ones writing.
Yep, that's what I suspected, too. A common idea in Feminism is the idea of "the Other", which is frightening at the same time as being alluring. Of course, the problem there is when an actual person is forced into the idea of what being the muse or the other or the within means - which can be very entrapping.

I don't think of my muse as a person, either. Fact, I haven't thought about it much at all. I just tend to think of it as my subconscious, which, when I'm think about or to it, the main idea I get from it is that it's big. Like a lot, lot bigger than me. Hee. Like a gigantic huge chasm of water over over my head with a couple of cracks at the base.

Reply

montavilla October 16 2007, 17:15:39 UTC
Hi, J ( ... )

Reply

j_forias October 16 2007, 19:03:59 UTC
Montavilla, you appear to have a Snape epic hidden under your hat. Is there any particular reason it's failed to make an appearance on the Quill? (Not that I can promise I'd be able to read it without becoming an apoplectic coalesence of seething wrath, but I'm sure others would enjoy it.)

Didn't Einstein say that he had no particular genius, he was just inquisitive. So maybe that ties in with the picking up ideas thing. And yes, I just compared you to Einstein.

Funny, sarcastic, angry kid, huh? *smiles*

Well, turning this to me, I write stories that I know I'll enjoy. If I don't think my book is the best book I've ever read, then I'm not trying hard enough. That usually means I'm the only one who finds the jokes funny or understands what the heck is going on with the plot, but that's the price one pays. I certainly laugh at my jokes and enjoy the writing. Yes, it's egotistical. But we all [i]need[/i] a bit of ego. Especially as writers.

Reply


rosathome September 2 2007, 17:59:28 UTC
I think you're dealing with a number of distinct concepts: spirituality; inspiration; the Muse.

For me spirituality is an internal thing - my spirituality is part of me, thus I suppose if it had to have a gender it would be female. I don't think that spirituality can be separated from the person who is/is not spiritual.

Inspiration, I think like stmargarets, is impersonal. It's there and it can be sparked by almost anything - an experience, an overheard conversation, an abstract thought, a vision of beauty...

The Muse. Ah. Well, now there I'd say stmargarets is spot on once again. For me, it's a dark haired man with cheekbones that could cut glass and a smile that lights up the world. But he doesn't visit nearly often enough. *grins*

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 18:16:14 UTC
Inspiration, I think like stmargarets, is impersonal.
I don't think St Margarets is impersonal. :p

It's interesting that you seperate the three. For me, just because something is a part of me, doesn't mean it has to be male. Like, for example, a muse is a part of person, surely, but often seems to have the opposite sex. I love the description of your muse, by the way. He sounds hot. ;)

*grins* It's all rather fascinating, isn't it?

Reply


katieowrites September 2 2007, 19:58:50 UTC
I think there's something kind of inherently feminine in the ephemeral and delicate imagery of Joyce, but I don't think it necessarily follows that that sort of beauty is indicative of spirituality. I think it is for Stephen, certainly, and Stephen's surname brings with it a propensity for wings and flight away from conventional mores of religion; he's always looking for ways to escape ( ... )

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 20:08:31 UTC
First thing is that you know a lot more about all this than I do. I may well be the most clueless person to ever do a Masters in English Lit. :)

I would agree that this ephemeral, delicate, feminine imagery is not necessarily spiritual - but, I think, as you go on to point out, that it often is in mythical literature, which is interesting.

May I ask what tends to instinctually call up religious or spiritual feeling in you? Because I think I agree. I always find rain incredibly spiritual, for example, or a mountain landscape. Hmm.

Reply

katieowrites September 2 2007, 20:11:20 UTC
Right, same kind of idea. Sunlight hittling leaves, the lake by my house, uncontrollable laughing fits, certain noises...

Part of this may have to do with the fact that there's something that doesn't fire in my frontal lobe, and I can't form mental pictures. Like I can't close my eyes and picture anything, though I could tell you what it looked like. So for me it has to be moments or images in a certain instant because for me they're all ephemeral.

Reply

j_forias September 2 2007, 20:16:23 UTC
I'm kinda like that with faces. I just can't visualise anybodies face. My mother, my sister, people I've known for years. I can't make that face appear in my mind's eye. Often I won't know a person is my friend until they speak. I'm always half-afraid it's not them, even when I can see them straight-on.

But yes, I certainly hear what you're saying.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up