(Untitled)

[jarick]

So, if I take eleven hours this summer (Chinese and two upper-div humanities), and eighteen hours this fall (Chinese and upper-division humanities), I can graduate precisely then

Comments

[noequal]

Move them around, and you can graduate May of 2011?

Sweet.

[jarick]

The end is in sight. How thrilling!

[noequal]

and that'll be the BA?

[jarick]

Mmmyep. Then the master's at wherever, then whatever at wherever!

[phoenix_seraph]

 
Hmmm.   Do they have an "official" differentiation between Androgyny and Genderqueering?

Strangely enough, if you read the statistics, the most virulent advocates of male emotional and interactive disempowerment are women, not men.   A large percentage of our nation's women are seriously threatened by the notion that men might become emotionally self-sufficient and form bonds with other men instead of remaining dependent upon women for all their emotional (and spiritual) needs.
 

[goldbug]

I think of androgyny as staying out of the gender fray, and not taking a side (which may or may not include acknowledging that there are more than two "sides"). I think of genderqueer as actively taking what works for you from any/all gender categories and smooshing them into your own unique expression.

Androgyny=Switzerland
Genderqueer=USA

Just my interpretation...

[phoenix_seraph]

 
Huhn.

I guess I've gone from being androgynous to genderqueering (likely because of my Gender Studies Ph.D. work) and generationqueering.

Huhn.
 

[junkmaster357]

Women, you say? Interesting, hypocritical, and a tad sadly ironic. I wonder how male/female relationships would change if men were able to become emotionally self-sufficient and able to freely form the deep bonds with men?