Some of this (up to potentially all of this) may be a post-facto pack of lies. It feels true, though, so I'm going to speak it while I still remember it. ( It might even be right! )
To share back with you a valuable insight you shared with me:
You recently suggested to me that Implicate Order might also be Emergent Order, in both the literal and the metaphysical meanings of the terms.
(Such a notion reconciles Nietzsche, Taoism, Absurdist Existentialism, mystical Christian understandings of God, and a host of other visions which seem so intuitively true.)
If this is true, would not Signs and Portents also be Emergent Phenomenon rather than pre-existing signposts?
Comments 2
When you're finished with the tacos, I could stand reading more of this.
Fascinating, insightful, intriguing, occasionally silly, awesome.
Reply
To share back with you a valuable insight you shared with me:
You recently suggested to me that Implicate Order might also be Emergent Order, in both the literal and the metaphysical meanings of the terms.
(Such a notion reconciles Nietzsche, Taoism, Absurdist Existentialism, mystical Christian understandings of God, and a host of other visions which seem so intuitively true.)
If this is true, would not Signs and Portents also be Emergent Phenomenon rather than pre-existing signposts?
Reply
Leave a comment