Weird. I mean... the Brits aren't exactly the most pro-war member of the coalition. Granted, they're a member, but popular English support obviously isn't with the war. Strange that they'd suffer an attack. It's the sort of thing that prompts people to get pissed and fight, look what S-11 did for the US... it's like someone wants to the Brits to
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Just terrorists, not prominent global organisations... I just giggle stupidly at the thought of Bin Laden straining over the latest Nelson polls. I'd paint them as more impetuous characters.
Reply
It could be another Madrid. But there is plenty of people disaffected by the current Blair government. However, it is likely this awful Al-Qaeda in Europe group. It makes me so sick people could do this. If it is Al-Qaeda, these people are now choosing symbolic dates - Bali was one year, one month and one day after 9/11. Madrid was just a few days before a very important election. London is the day of the G8. These people know how to get attention when the world is already watching. And now we are distracted from G8
And in London, there is always a lot of security. However, resources would have been stretched, the top dogs wouldn't have been in London.
Sorry. I'm ranting. This is just so disgusting.
Reply
I'm very curious to see how the British public react to this, very curious indeed. S-11 pushed the US in one direction, Madrid had a very different effect. I'll bet that, at very least, this results in those 'indentity chip' things that Blair's been ranting about.
Reply
Non-Brits are forgetting that the British are very used to attacks on home soil - they've been going through it since the Blitz and they were expecting it. No one expected them to attack a place like Madrid. But London? That's a target.
Venting again. I geuss I'm trying to say that the Brits are used to destructive terrorism and violence. The shock here is after the elation of live8/olympics, not the fact that there was a terrorist attack.
Reply
Leave a comment