CAUTION: Complaining ahead.
I think it all boils down to this: ARE PEOPLE REALLY THAT STUPID?Item #1: I collect paper for recycling. It's amazing what little trash you have after you pull out all paper/product packaging, etc. When I have a paper sack full I take it by the local Lutheran church who have a collection bin in their parking lot. They
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
I'm sorry about your tree. :-( It's crazy that Dupont thinks they can just replace a 40 y.o. tree. It reminds me of a documentary I saw a few weeks ago called "If A Tree Falls..." on PBS.
http://video.pbs.org/video/2122024902
Yeah, that one will stick with me for a looong time. :-(
Reply
I SHOULD HAVE HAD A DOZEN KIDS. No, not really, lol.
It's hard for me to imagine them replacing as many trees as I've got damaged. They'd have to dig up half the yard and that would damage the root systems of the other surviving trees!
That video looks really good---I'll have to check it out.
Reply
Yes that, and it's just so EASY not to care and be selfish or cruel.
Gosh. Is there no chance the trees can be saved?
The documentary is excellent, but really tough to watch sometimes. :-(
Reply
Reply
And you know, it's not just that it's a piece of property. The tree was at least 70 years old, and its a variety that you can't buy commercially anymore. It makes me sick to think that one jerk showing off to his friends can kill something so unique with so much history.
Anyway, I really hope your spruces survive; from the photo, it actually looks quite lovely.
Reply
If I were you I'd set some nice traps for trespassing frat boys...
Reply
Not to make things more complicated (and certainly, it's hard to ascribe financial value to a 40-year old tree), but maybe have a brief chat with a lawyer in your area, re: your rights and compensation?
So here's my question: If I work for Dupont developing new deadly chemical cocktails and they're supposed to be used on people's lawns wouldn't I ask myself, "Will this harm anything else on the lawn---like TREES?"In defense of the poor schmuck chemists working in R&D for DuPont, they had reason to believe that aminocyclopyrachlor (the active ingredient in Imprelis) is selective for broad-leaf vegetation, which would not include most forms of trees, and especially not evergreen trees ( ... )
Reply
Agreed. We're waiting to see how exactly Dupont will settle these claims. If it's not sweet enough we'll stir the pot of litigation.
You're right about the poor scientist---I was getting a little excited, lol. The bureaucracy of a company like Dupont must be staggering. The 'results' no doubt were in line with their 'plan' all along. Hopefully someone really responsible will end up the scapegoat.
Oh, and you mentioned the grass clippings---hadn't even thought about that since I've put some in my compost pile. *facepalm*
Reply
They don't think at all, I'd say. Their motivation is just to get rid of it. It's laziness and nothing more.
I'm so sorry about your beautiful trees. :( That poor spruce. I really hope that DuPont catches a lot of hell for this.
*hugs*
Reply
I love my big evergreen trees. They're one of the reasons we bought this house. The first time the boys saw the house (while house-hunting) they called it the house with the Christmas trees. They climbed in them and got full of tree sap, lol.
Reply
Leave a comment