I have always felt that only simple, focused and easy to understand concepts catch on quickly. Take XML for example. The benefits of using XML as a data description standard for data exchange between applications is now well understood. Unfortunately its popularity has also resulted in XML being incorporated into completely un-needed areas.
For a
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
Reply
- it makes the topic difficult to adapt to, if XML doesnt suit it
- buzz-words undermine other possibly more logistically correct approaches
- if the whole thing fails, it gives a bad name to XML !
I agree with you in the observation. But then again there are a lot of other factors that go into something's popularity, a major one is tool support and XML has plenty of that : does that let a VXML user leverage anything ? if yes, VXML may have more meat.
passing thoughts,
Roshan
Reply
* ITS toooo.. bulky.. if you are 70 Kg, and belive me.. putting you in XML he would make you 210 Kg!!!!!.
* Many a times, it would be really enconmic to read direcly from your own defined data structure, rather than going thru the parsers...
* Read just basics of XML(How and why XML) and tell those basic to yourself, 20 times; then take your decision
PS: I love XML for its simplicity, but hate people for not using their commonsense while makeing decisions of its usage..... last but least, if at all I was better than anyone at work it was not because, I was good, it was because, I had commonsense over him.
Viju Chacko
Reply
Leave a comment