I'm not even going to bother filtering THIS

[jcello]

Link is here: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/06/south.carolina.ap/index.html

Candidate: No single, pregnant teachers in classroomWednesday, October 6, 2004 Posted: 7:37 AM EDT (1137 GMT

Comments

[ter369]

So now potential employees have to pass a morals test? Whose morals?

This wouldn't stop at schools. What about hospitals? Do you know who's touching you when you're unconscious in surgery? And flying our airplanes! What highjinks might two men get up to, all alone up in the cockpit? I mean, now that they close and lock the door.

Yeesh.

I am afraid of this ignorant dude.

[alto2]

Sweet Mother of God.

These are the same people who want to take away my medically-necessary birth control pills but think it's cool for insurance companies to cover Viagra.

We are SO fucked up as a society. ::headdesk::

[christinekh]

"We need the folks that are teaching in schools to represent our values,"

I think that about sums it up -- they want everyone to conform to THEIR values. Arrgghhhhh...

They should be thankful for any teachers they can get, including pregnant, unwed, homosexual, non-christians. Especially given what they pay them and the stuff they expect them to put up with. But that's for another rant.

We are SO fucked up as a society.

You ain't kidding.
I get so sad when I think about the state of this country. ::sigh::

[thestickywicket]

DeMint said: "I would have given the same answer when asked if a single woman, who was pregnant and living with her boyfriend, should be hired to teach my third-grade children. I just think the moral decisions are different with a teacher."

::TWITCH:: This guy is a flaming asshole. I remember his name, but don't know why. You know it came up in those lovely political emails I got all summer. C'mon, people, VOTE. My God.

!!!

[comice]

That is all.

[girlgone]

I wanna spit, too!!!

Asshats.