I am a dedicated reader of
World Wide Words, and last week's update tossed a new buzzword up into my eye-line. "ETEWAF", the emerging state of "Everything That Ever Was, Available Forever" as the Internet removes the barriers of obscurity and limited availability from, well, everything. And true to concept, the source of the term was only a
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
The only way I could see the internet ruining art is that there is a tenuous link (one being researched to this day, if I recall) between overuse of computers and clinical depression. And maybe it's just me talking out my ass, but I'd rather envision that most prolific artists are far more manic-depressive than pure depressed. Otherwise they wouldn't produce a single painting, as it would seem like too much effort.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I do think that there's a grain of accuracy in the idea that pop culture right now consists largely of "recutting, repurposing, and manipulation"--not to mention remakes, reboots, in-jokes, and mashing of existing genres. While it's true that art is referential and equally true that there's nothing new under the sun, I have been thinking for a while that we're living in an unusually referential era for pop/geek culture. But if I want to go out on a limb, I'd attribute it to the relative stability of American culture since World War II. By this I mean that trends have mostly had the chance to develop gradually and organically rather than being yanked by overnight developments.
Still, I would be very surprised to see the the amount of anything--truly inspired remixes, more ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment