(no subject)
Robertdweiss1: i've done that too
ChocolateKiss234: you've believed in gay marraige?
ChocolateKiss234: thats good
Robertdweiss1: civil unions
Robertdweiss1: same thing
ChocolateKiss234: kiss my ass civil unions are for pussys
Robertdweiss1: just not the same idealogical political part
Robertdweiss1: same rights
Robertdweiss1: it just creates less conflict
ChocolateKiss234: then everyone should have civil unions
Robertdweiss1: yes, they should
ChocolateKiss234: do you believe in the constitution?
Robertdweiss1: yup
ChocolateKiss234: You know where it says EQUAL RIGHTS FOR EVERYONE?
Robertdweiss1: everyone would still have EQUAL RIGHTS
Robertdweiss1: same rights different label
ChocolateKiss234: Well giving some people the right of marraige and others the right of civil unions isn't equal now is it
Robertdweiss1: ya, equal RIGHTS
Robertdweiss1: same rgiths in both situations
ChocolateKiss234: its descriminating people by there sexual prefreance Robert
Robertdweiss1: no
ChocolateKiss234: BUT ITS NOT THE SAME TITLE
ChocolateKiss234: say you got a new promotion and your title didn't change but your friend got the same promotion and you are EQUAL but he got a cool new title
Robertdweiss1: some would say freedom of religion makes it so taht we must give christian churches rights and becuz of certain laws that would mean that it's up to them wether or not it is marriage
Robertdweiss1: i wouldn't care
ChocolateKiss234: other religions have marriage too
Robertdweiss1: i'm about what actions not about misleading words
ChocolateKiss234: its not a title left only to christians
Robertdweiss1: than they can get married in those religions
Robertdweiss1: the "christian thing" was not the point
ChocolateKiss234: The government should call it one thing
ChocolateKiss234: no matter who you are getting married to
Robertdweiss1: i'm just saying there are gay christians that want to get married in a christian church and that just can't happen
Robertdweiss1: and the government gave every church and every religion rights
ChocolateKiss234: if they want to recognize homosexual marraige as "civil unions" then they should recognize all marraige as "civil unions"
Robertdweiss1: read wut i jsut said
ChocolateKiss234: yeah
ChocolateKiss234: but it isn't about the church
ChocolateKiss234: the government recognizes heterosexual unions as MARRAIGES
Robertdweiss1: so they promised rites to churches and people, and both rules are being followed under wut u call gay marriage, having the same rights under civil unions
Robertdweiss1: the Church has rights
Robertdweiss1: we have freedom of religion in this country
ChocolateKiss234: but they shouldn't change the title between people
Robertdweiss1: but they have to under the CONSTITION that u meantioned
Robertdweiss1: constitution
Robertdweiss1: u can't force a church to marry people
ChocolateKiss234: i'm not trying to force anyone to marry anyone
Robertdweiss1: than wut ru suggesting lol
ChocolateKiss234: I'm saying the government should come up with a diffrent name to call ALL unions between people
Robertdweiss1: sure
ChocolateKiss234: the government title not the church title
Robertdweiss1: thats fine
ChocolateKiss234: and it should be one title for EVERYONE
ChocolateKiss234: thank you
Robertdweiss1: but under the church they have a right to call heterosexual marriages "marriage"
ChocolateKiss234: yes under the church
Robertdweiss1: than we agree
ChocolateKiss234: an unofficial title of "marriage"
ChocolateKiss234: yes good
Oh and I have a new boyfriend :D
Oh and I am going to have another NIECE :D
ChocolateKiss234: you've believed in gay marraige?
ChocolateKiss234: thats good
Robertdweiss1: civil unions
Robertdweiss1: same thing
ChocolateKiss234: kiss my ass civil unions are for pussys
Robertdweiss1: just not the same idealogical political part
Robertdweiss1: same rights
Robertdweiss1: it just creates less conflict
ChocolateKiss234: then everyone should have civil unions
Robertdweiss1: yes, they should
ChocolateKiss234: do you believe in the constitution?
Robertdweiss1: yup
ChocolateKiss234: You know where it says EQUAL RIGHTS FOR EVERYONE?
Robertdweiss1: everyone would still have EQUAL RIGHTS
Robertdweiss1: same rights different label
ChocolateKiss234: Well giving some people the right of marraige and others the right of civil unions isn't equal now is it
Robertdweiss1: ya, equal RIGHTS
Robertdweiss1: same rgiths in both situations
ChocolateKiss234: its descriminating people by there sexual prefreance Robert
Robertdweiss1: no
ChocolateKiss234: BUT ITS NOT THE SAME TITLE
ChocolateKiss234: say you got a new promotion and your title didn't change but your friend got the same promotion and you are EQUAL but he got a cool new title
Robertdweiss1: some would say freedom of religion makes it so taht we must give christian churches rights and becuz of certain laws that would mean that it's up to them wether or not it is marriage
Robertdweiss1: i wouldn't care
ChocolateKiss234: other religions have marriage too
Robertdweiss1: i'm about what actions not about misleading words
ChocolateKiss234: its not a title left only to christians
Robertdweiss1: than they can get married in those religions
Robertdweiss1: the "christian thing" was not the point
ChocolateKiss234: The government should call it one thing
ChocolateKiss234: no matter who you are getting married to
Robertdweiss1: i'm just saying there are gay christians that want to get married in a christian church and that just can't happen
Robertdweiss1: and the government gave every church and every religion rights
ChocolateKiss234: if they want to recognize homosexual marraige as "civil unions" then they should recognize all marraige as "civil unions"
Robertdweiss1: read wut i jsut said
ChocolateKiss234: yeah
ChocolateKiss234: but it isn't about the church
ChocolateKiss234: the government recognizes heterosexual unions as MARRAIGES
Robertdweiss1: so they promised rites to churches and people, and both rules are being followed under wut u call gay marriage, having the same rights under civil unions
Robertdweiss1: the Church has rights
Robertdweiss1: we have freedom of religion in this country
ChocolateKiss234: but they shouldn't change the title between people
Robertdweiss1: but they have to under the CONSTITION that u meantioned
Robertdweiss1: constitution
Robertdweiss1: u can't force a church to marry people
ChocolateKiss234: i'm not trying to force anyone to marry anyone
Robertdweiss1: than wut ru suggesting lol
ChocolateKiss234: I'm saying the government should come up with a diffrent name to call ALL unions between people
Robertdweiss1: sure
ChocolateKiss234: the government title not the church title
Robertdweiss1: thats fine
ChocolateKiss234: and it should be one title for EVERYONE
ChocolateKiss234: thank you
Robertdweiss1: but under the church they have a right to call heterosexual marriages "marriage"
ChocolateKiss234: yes under the church
Robertdweiss1: than we agree
ChocolateKiss234: an unofficial title of "marriage"
ChocolateKiss234: yes good
Oh and I have a new boyfriend :D
Oh and I am going to have another NIECE :D