(Untitled)

Jul 28, 2005 03:35

SEX

so today as gotten slightly better thanks only to talking to another female about sex. However, she is sharing her lesbian experiences while I share my heterosexual experiences. Who said the queers and the straights could not relate and communicate ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 22

helloprettyone July 28 2005, 20:28:34 UTC
"(ie; I hate being on top, and I love to be fucked from behind - and trust me, that is only the beginning). The thing is - people dont understand trust. If I were to have a one night stand, it's not as if I'd explore all my sexual fantasies. I have to truly trust and love the person I am with - and that is when shit gets crazy. However, I seem to have the luck of picking guys who are not sexually up to par with me (meaning - they have other interests, not that they cannot last). That is not to say that I do not have good sex, because generally I do especially recently. All I'm saying is that I am a sexual person, and sex does not offend me usually in any way."I'm on the same page as you there, sounds like. :)And I'm not TOO far from being feminist. Joey said so before, and Joey don't lie! j/k...I really believe so as well ( ... )

Reply


aroundthebend July 28 2005, 20:37:43 UTC
I don't know much about feminism but I think that knowing what you want in bed and not being ashamed of that is all apart of being comfortable with yourself and your sexuality. Imagine all the unhappy people just going along with things and never really admitting what they like or don't like in bed. How horrible it must be to be them. Most because they probably don't feel comfortable in their own skin or trust their partner enough. As for being on top it really isn't all that great for me either. It has it's moments but you know. I would preffer other things.

Gael Garcia Bernal is fucking beautiful. My god!

Reply


delta_minus July 29 2005, 00:14:13 UTC
of course, sex is very mental, but not completely. women are put together differently, and enjoying a certain position doesn't have to be a reflection of your political views at all. it could just mean that's the position that really gets it right where it needs to be.

besides, there's a complete duality to domination/being dominated, and a theory that's always made a lot of sense to me holds that the dominated really gains control by allowing the domination while the dominator is put in a position of submission by the very need to dominate.

but who knows? at the end of the day, all mental trips aside, i just like to get my fuck on.

Reply

rioters July 30 2005, 00:10:40 UTC
"I hate being on top, and I love to be fucked from behind - and of course, that is only the beginning"- In retard voice.

Reply

jentle July 30 2005, 00:49:56 UTC
well, except with you Blake. When you use that retard (southpark) voice, I'll fuck you.. on top, for 5 hours, everyday, for 2 weeks straight.

Reply


xlabrysx July 30 2005, 05:07:06 UTC
This pro-sex feminist approves. So do Feminists for Free Expression and other kick ass feminists. Sexual exploration and not censoring one's self from being free to explore any idea is so incredibly healthy and progressive - go you.

Reply


phoenix_riddle August 4 2005, 01:21:25 UTC
I don't know if anybody's familiar with it or not, but Jane Sexes It Up is a pretty good pro-sex, feminist anthology.

Also, the introduction to Leather Women, a book of bdsm erotica, says some interesting things about sexual exploration. Good luck finding it, though - I believe it to be out of print (half.com, maybe?). If you decide to seek it, be warned: there are a couple of pretty brutal sex stories in it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up