Er, my childhood got revised, that's odd

Aug 06, 2008 15:46

I tend to think of the malleable nature of history and pre-history as just something that happens to other people's pasts, but now someone has written a book about my best friend in secondary school, putting me into a parallel universe which Looks Different.

enter the Twilight Zone )

Leave a comment

Comments 14

fuschiafaery August 6 2008, 16:01:33 UTC
It's always strange to hear how other people's memories and experiences differ, it must have been very odd for you to read this!

Reply

anadel1976 August 6 2008, 17:15:57 UTC
>It's always strange to hear how other people's memories and experiences differ

Ssssoooooooooo true and fascinating too!

Reply


anadel1976 August 6 2008, 17:14:54 UTC
>I don't see true gender on people very clearly

Don't think of it as not seeing people for their true gender, but rather you see the person as an individual. You seem to see people for their qualities, their character rather their physical equipment. That's a good thing.

Reply

jeremy_m August 6 2008, 18:18:37 UTC
That does sound better than just being dim, yes.

It may also be that I gravitate to people who chose their attributes retail, one at a time, rather than getting one of the pre-configured packages such as male/female/Christian/Socialist/whatever. Wife1 was particularly eclectic (mixed up?) in that way, and it's curious now to recall when she first met Dru, who was Drew then. She (D, male at the time) was impressed with how butch she (wife, female at the time) was because she let her (him, I give up on pronouns) take her (their) nail varnish off with a knife.

It might be fun to get them together again, if there's ever a moment when their revolving sexualities also line up.

Reply


sashagoblin August 6 2008, 19:33:21 UTC
Wow. Headfuck. But yes, i agree with T on the not-being-tied-to-biological-gender being an advantage... *hugs*

Reply


dru_marland January 3 2009, 07:26:22 UTC
Hi, Jeremy

Gosh, just found this and caught up on at least some of your news...

Reply

pogodragon January 3 2009, 10:00:41 UTC
J just told me you'd commented on here, hi, nice to 'see' you again. (This is J's person what he lives with, it's been pointed out that my details on here are more than a little obscure)

Reply

dru_marland January 4 2009, 07:45:25 UTC
Hi, Pogodragon person! *waves*

Yes, a little obscure...

We did work hard at making the book as truthful and honest as poss. I'd be interested to hear J's take on the things he thinks I kept from Richard... I like the notion of retail attributes, though I suspect that a lot of that stuff is hard-wired.

Reply

pogodragon January 4 2009, 08:58:48 UTC
As he can see this conversation I'm sure he'll join in at some point :-)

I admit I like the idea of retail attributes as well, though to me it tends to imply the idea of actually thinking about stuff rather than going for the socially acceptable default. Obviously some stuff is hard-wired and really difficult to do anything about, but other things are much more amenable to thought and conscious choice. But then, I've spent the last 11 years or so being and living with a heretic, you kind of get used to making choices where many people (though probably not people who read this LJ) don't realise that there are choices.

And I'm waffling 'cos I'm pre-caffeine...

Reply


dru_marland January 4 2009, 19:09:01 UTC
Yes, P, same for me; I used to live among hippies and sailors, which was much more lively and interesting than the middle class family types I somehow ended up among (perhaps because I'm middle class and a parent)(sort of)(middle class that is)

I've been gently dipping, but not yet too deep, J. Are you teaching or studying the course? It sounds interesting. I was countering some stuff from Julie Bindel, an essentialist feminist, the other week; she thinks that gender is an entirely social construct, and TS women are actually gay men, or something, perpetuating the gender binary. And then last week we had the Pope saying that we are as much of a threat as the destruction of the rain forests because we subvert the aforementioned gender binary. Blah blah. It's nice to be appreciated.

I wondered what had happened to you; there was much dropping off of people back then, and I just assumed the worst and went off in a huff. You know how it is. Thanks for calling me pretty, though.

Reply

pogodragon January 4 2009, 20:49:29 UTC
I presume you know rozk, she was writing quite a lot about Julie Bindel a few weeks ago on there.

(I would write more, but Roz is more eloquent than I am, and I need to go watch Celebrity Big Brother about now :-) )

Reply

jeremy_m January 4 2009, 21:08:58 UTC
> she thinks that gender is an entirely social construct ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up