Arrived to your site by six degrees of separation.
Are you using the converse fallacy? That just because Q->H, H->Q drawn from the belief that H<->Q (the if and only if condition). A typical counterexample is consider x=1 -> x^2=1, but x^2=1 -/-> x=1 for x may equal -1.
It was actually a gross oversimplification, geared towards my friends who just finished taking propositional logic. The truth is, you cannot express this with any meaning in propositional logic because there is no way to qualify relations. The actual proof would have far more variables, but it would have been lost on 98% of my audience. I'm glad someone caught me though.
Comments 5
I <3 Joanie
Reply
If Gushing --> ~Sarah.
If Cuteness --> ~Sarah.
I think this is the logical way of saying that our relationship, Joanie, is something of an 'aut', if you know what I mean.
Reply
If S equals Sarah
and A equals awesome then
If S-->A
A if and only if you're S.
anyway, logic sucked. but apparently you guys make it fun.
Reply
Are you using the converse fallacy? That just because Q->H, H->Q drawn from the belief that H<->Q (the if and only if condition). A typical counterexample is consider x=1 -> x^2=1, but x^2=1 -/-> x=1 for x may equal -1.
oh well,
a complete stranger.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment