the sun will come out tomorrow.

Oct 25, 2011 12:05

Populism makes me nervous. I'm a nervous guy anyway, an ex-risk manager (a psyche one never manages to overcome, at least, not me, not yet), a conservative person with paranoid tendencies. Populism is, on one level, about the masses feeling discord with the system, and with the "elite" that succeed in that system ( Read more... )

fascism, judaism, politics

Leave a comment

Comments 17

(The comment has been removed)

jonathankaplan October 25 2011, 19:42:41 UTC
okay...the tea party has a lot of amorphous goals, it touches the minds of many with its "return to the original principles of the consitution" rhetoric, but would you say it already has its "nefarious" leaders in place?
I agree that a movement formed from the top (like the TP) rather than formed from the bottom (like OWS) will have plenty of different aspects from each other. Yet, even though the origin might be different, the TP is certainly now a populist movement within those starting limits, and the emotions and impact created now goes beyond anything the Koch brothers can marionette themselves, don't you think?
I appreciate your reply, even though it is increasing my apprehension on this topic. Thanks!

Reply

anonymous October 25 2011, 21:49:07 UTC
Well, I do spend a fair amount of time with the local Occupation, as it is quite close to where we live, and many of their marches go through my street, and end up in another of our area's parks.

However, I do not spend any time with teapartiers, nor would I be welcome there for many, many, many reasons. Which is another huge difference.

Reply

a bullet probably dodged. jonathankaplan October 27 2011, 15:30:38 UTC
In one specific sense, i am somewhat pleased that you would not be welcomed by the tea people ,(presumably, to name one factor, a few of your "social" beliefs probably would clash too strongly, ...just a guess?) Good, then. My strong(est) worry on this front is that someone very charismatic could manage to "use" the two groups simultaneously. That would be bad on too many levels.
The less likely that occurrence, the less worried i will be. Let the two groups work out their results separately, some positives might come from some of it. Put them together somehow and it turns into a potential mob machine.

thanks a lot for your reply, hope you are well.

as a postscript, I'll comment that, to me, both groups have racist implications in their gut. I hope that bile all stays there and doesnt vomit up. One of the good parts of the last 50 years has been the increasing demographic diversity in the US political, economic and social struces end up anti-diversity. hope that doesnt happen.

Reply


thetalkingmoose October 25 2011, 21:06:00 UTC
I personally don't think there's anything to get apprehensive over -- from either side. I have seen or heard nothing that leads me to believe that the OWS movement will turn violent. And while I initially felt a great deal of concern about the Tea Party and its use of violent rhetoric, it's become clear that that movement isn't inclined to violence either.

Reply

jonathankaplan October 27 2011, 15:52:45 UTC
thanks, Moose!
its always great to see you with a beer...even just that is some level of reassuring...smile....

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

jonathankaplan October 27 2011, 15:40:40 UTC
the foul and evil nature of Homeland Security deserves its own post. suffice to say i think we should eliminate the department immediately. that one department and its potential of pushing us into Fascist structures (and modes of thinking) is more dangerous than what it is purporting to protect by far, in my opinion.

Reply

michaelsullivan November 7 2011, 17:32:49 UTC
My wife (who used to work in immigration law) and I literally cried the day that INS became part of homeland security.

The symbolism of treating foreigners who have come to our shores to join us as *primarily* a danger, rather than the huge bounty of creativity, labor, culture and strength that immigrants represent 99% of the time, is just crushing. For me, it was the last nail in the coffin of any hope I once had that we would respond in any way constructively to 9/11.

Reply


loser_variable October 26 2011, 21:07:09 UTC
My take is we’re too comfortable for an Arab spring situation. Protestors with iphones and Aeropostale shirts aren’t going to overthrow the government if they even know what they're angry about. I think the Pee Party crowd mostly want attention, and to get baked. Many of these protestors have yet to work a day in their lives. They’ve been resource sinks for 25 years, and they’re mad at the system? Please. If they died today their tombstone would read "Contributed nothing."

They remind me of Rage Against the Machine. Multimillionaires from Orange county, employees of the billionaire Sony conglomerate, sitting poolside at the mansion writing songs about how unfair the system is, maaan. Die in a fire.

I guess what I'm saying is, don't worry.

Reply

jonathankaplan October 27 2011, 15:42:19 UTC
there is much good thinking in your reply.
thanks a ton!

Reply

michaelsullivan November 7 2011, 18:17:26 UTC
really? The description of the protests reads like a bunch of regurgitated right-wing and "serious centrist" tropes to me ( ... )

Reply


anonymous October 27 2011, 12:43:06 UTC
In the long run, yes. FedGov has assumed the role of protector and decider of all things. As long as they had lots of money they could buy people more than they coerced them. The fiat money fraud is unraveling which means more inflation. Inflation cannot disguise the reality of government payoffs becoming increasingly worthless. Since bribery is failing FedGov must resort more to direct violence which causes counter-violence and rioting. This is a necessary result of a deficit financed welfare/warfare state.
The global trade/banking system based significantly on USD means all countries are failing at about the same time. Rural areas of America which are well armed and ethnically homogeneous will be the safest places, even for ethnic minorities. Rural people hardly ever riot and there is less 'necessity' or scope for government to oppress armed rural people.

Reply

jonathankaplan October 27 2011, 15:49:42 UTC
much of what i've written the last few years sounds a lot like that future. ugh.
but you are right about the rural people aspect, and its implications. there are amish farms all around here, for gosh sake, hard to see this area turning (as easily) into the apocalyptic hell that the Bronx (as example) could become. That is reassuring.
Thanks!

Reply

Actually, in a hyperinflation ext_736599 November 3 2011, 16:38:04 UTC
The rural areas tend to do very very well. It happened in Argentina. It happened in Germany. And I suspect it will happen here too.

Take heart, you might just be in the right place - at the right time :) It is what you're supposed to do as a trader, no?

Reply

michaelsullivan November 7 2011, 18:28:10 UTC
I don't understand the current fear of hyperinflation. The amount of inflation required to control current debt is small. If the economy were returned to potential, we would be close to primary budget balance. If we paid the same amount for healthcare as the rest of the rich world, we'd have primary balance even today.

Where does the sense that we are doomed to hyperinflation come from? Except for automatic stabilizers that kicked in in the great recession, government is *shrinking* as a share of GDP.

The worry that I see, and that the markets see is that we are so irrationally afraid of inflation that we will refuse to pick up what look like trillion dollar bills on the sidewalk available in interest free funding of medium term infrastructure improvements, and further monetary easing.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up