Comments | jonnoble: (без темы)

jonnoble

(Untitled)

Mar 10, 2006 15:21

There's a debate happening in the news room right now on who's worse Bill O' Reilly or Rush Limbaugh(sp?). What's your opinion?

Comments 12

noizeindex March 10 2006, 20:30:14 UTC

Rush is just a pill popping fat tard. He may want to sell you a piece of crap "radio chair" with his name on it, but Bill O'Reilly would be driving the train to Auschwitz. For Serious.

die_puny_human March 10 2006, 20:36:05 UTC

Bill is without a doubt. Not for his views but because he still has some shread of credibility. As pretty much the spokesman for the Fox News Network his voice I belive carries more weight than the incorherent rambelings we so often hear from Rush. While I believe both are paranoid,delusional,whores for the far right Bill has done a better job of hiding his mental disorder than Rush.

jonnoble March 10 2006, 23:13:30 UTC

Rush probably has a bigger audience than O'Reilly. His radio show is available in more markets, and also is available in short-wave (which makes listenable from outside the U.S.). I could be mistaken but Rush's numbers should be larger than O'Reilly's regardless if O'Reilly is more visable due to his TV show.

Rush is worse in my opinion because he kind of paved the way for O'Reilly to even have a career. He was first super conservative cockface.

noizeindex March 10 2006, 23:19:06 UTC

Oh, so by your reasoning does that make naked whore #107 better than naked whore #1 at City Club??? I don't think so.

jonnoble March 10 2006, 23:46:57 UTC

If I remember correctly the first naked whore was more attractive than the millions that followed. It's not a rule that the first is better(or worse). The first could just be somewhere inbetween as well. It just another bullet point in the presentation not tha main idea.

narcissa_undone March 10 2006, 20:55:09 UTC

Definitely Bill, for the reasons Dan stated. He's far more dangerous because more people listen to him. Rush is easier to dismiss as a nutter.

jonnoble March 10 2006, 23:14:01 UTC

read my response to Dan

They're both idiots. kitschicat March 10 2006, 21:12:32 UTC

Sorry, but the minute you put both of them in a sentence, I can no longer manage any thought beyond this one:

( ... )

Re: They're both idiots. jonnoble March 10 2006, 23:15:01 UTC

I realize I'm going hell for putting those two names in one sentence... that, and other things.

maschine9 March 10 2006, 21:19:10 UTC

That's like asking: "Hey which is worse, sliding down the dull end of a mile long rusty razor blade or eating the shit right out of a syphalitic hooker's ass?"

jonnoble March 10 2006, 23:16:43 UTC

hahahahahahahaha