Supreme Court Decisions

[jordan179]

I am glad that the Supreme Court sustained the legality of same-sex marriage across the country.  It is my profound belief, based on the logic that marriage is a mutual choice between any two people who decide to unite their lives in love, that marriage should not be only allowed between persons of opposite sexes.  Marriage is not purely for the

Comments

Concerning the SSM issue in general...

[mrbirthday]

Jordan, I think you would find it VERY interesting to look at Moe Lane's site, he has lots of stuff on the topic. Also, strike up a conversation with him.

P.S., his site address is http://moelane.com/.

On Obamacare

[benschachar_77]

I don't get the dang Republicans anymore.
No, no don't repeal the miserable anti-consumer legislation the Dems farted out without bothering to examine or read call it a tax.

No, no don't bother repealing the unconstitutional turd sandwich that's raising premiums and deductibles across the board just fix it.

No, no don't bother repealing it, instead fix the language under an utterly bizarre contrivance to make it fit "the spirit of the law".

Has the establishment lost its dang mind? Now is not the time to let this thing go, we should be using every opportunity to dismantle this thing before the LIVs who only watch The Daily Show have a chance to forget how hard this thing is hitting their wallet and affecting most everyone's livelihood.

And yeah goodbye rule of law. I wonder how long it takes to go from abandoning the rule of law to dictatorship.

Re: On Obamacare

[jordan179]

The Republican Establishment is deeply demoralized. They can't accept that their compromise candidates, John McCain and Mitt Romney, were rejected in 2008 and 2012 largely because of their lack of courage in standing on their principles. They want to offer more of the same but sense it won't work. They also fear that if they admit that it won't work they'll lose their leadership of the party.

We need another Reagan.

[hastka]

If McCain can be considered a "compromise candidate," I think that's part of the issue right there. :)

As long as the Republicans continue to (by choice or desperation) turn to the redneck-and-religious-far-right voting block, I don't see things changing. Would the modern Republican party even be an organization that would attract, accept, and promote a modern-day Ronald Reagan in the first place?

Maybe "President Schwarzenegger" would have worked out, in accordance with Back to the Future II... if not for that foreign birth thing. :)

It seems to me the current guard of the Republican Party deserves to lay in the bed of demoralization they made for themselves, wrecking an otherwise decent party, but I hope someone digs them out eventually.

In closely-related news, are you familiar with Giggles the Pig?

[benschachar_77]

Someone doesn't understand McCain.

[gothelittle]

This is the *primary* reason why I oppose 'same-sex marriage

Please to see icon

[mosinging1986]

Well said. This the government promoting the idea - or rather, legally FORCING the idea down our collective throats - that males and females are *exactly the same* and therefore interchangeable. This is biologically, scientifically false.

This leads to the push to remove terms like "husband" "wife", "mother" and "father" - as if removing words from pieces of paper is able to change reality and biology itself!

But why not? If you can make yourself into the opposite sex by claiming, wishing, feeling or "identifying" as such, then why not?

It's pure insanity. And people cheer it on. It's astounding to me.

uh-oh

[benschachar_77]

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/12-times-the-obama-administration-caved-to-iran-on-nuclear-deal/

[madman101]

That is the point, lame-ass. I am mocking you idiots. Gee, does this somehow make me anti-gay? I FOUGHT FOR GAYS PROBABLY BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.

I fight ignorance.

Get you fucking heads out of your asses.

Look around.

The world is headed in an economic nose-dive.

So lets sip coffee and remark.

[jordan179]

Mocking which idiots about what? I'm confused -- I don't know to whom this was a response?