for we know we need each other so

Aug 25, 2008 13:05

Dear Mr Paxman, I don't really have an awful lot of respect for you now. What a sad, blinkered, privileged, objectively incorrect worldview.

Leave a comment

Comments 13

cabbagemedley August 25 2008, 12:13:52 UTC
Oh what fuckwittery.

Reply


ultharkitty August 25 2008, 12:40:25 UTC
Poor thing, he's obviously had such a raw deal, what with some women having jobs in his industry.

Reply

cabbagemedley August 25 2008, 13:48:59 UTC
Isn't it dreadful? Just imagine, he can't even be sure that the job he wants won't go to a black working-class woman instead.

Reply

phonemonkey August 25 2008, 14:05:40 UTC
I know, he's clearly been passed over for SO many promotions, hasn't he, poor dear?

Reply


meedja August 25 2008, 13:00:40 UTC
Oh, he can be an enormous prick sometimes, can't he?

Reply


biascut August 25 2008, 14:30:55 UTC
OH GOD, MEN.

Let's see some men in the same industry stand up and say that that's bollocks. Oh wait, they won't! Because it's not their problem, is it?

Reply

strictlytrue August 25 2008, 15:56:20 UTC
OH GOD, MEN.

He he. I'm not falling for that one again ;)

I'm not in the industry, but I'll gladly say it's bollocks. It gives me enormous pleasure to do so. I've never had much respect for Paxman, and this confirms all my worst suspicions about him.

Reply

biascut August 25 2008, 16:58:58 UTC
It would be lovely if another man with similar status at the BBC stood up and said how ridiculous it was With Statistics, though. I mean, I can see why they would think that it wasn't their place and that a woman should answer this kind of charge, but it does make it seem men-vs.-womeny rather than common-sense-vs.-being-a-wankery.

Reply

strictlytrue August 25 2008, 17:27:35 UTC
It would be lovely if another man with similar status at the BBC stood up and said how ridiculous it was With Statistics, though. I mean, I can see why they would think that it wasn't their place and that a woman should answer this kind of charge, but it does make it seem men-vs.-womeny rather than common-sense-vs.-being-a-wankery.

It would indeed. Although I can't help wondering if whoever wrote the article simply went direct to Frostrup because it made a nice "boyz v. girlz" story. It would be genuinely interesting to see other prominent male BBC employees be asked whether they agreed with Paxo.

Reply


aoanla August 25 2008, 14:33:04 UTC
He's a grumpy old man in an industry with an increasing (but still minority) fraction of women in important positions. Its' quite common for such people to perceive the shift in relation to "status quo", rather than in an absolute sense.

And didn't John Humphreys or someone say something similar a couple of years ago?

Not that this excuses the incorrectness, though, of course.

Reply

biascut August 25 2008, 16:57:07 UTC
Michael Buerk certainly did.

Reply

aoanla August 25 2008, 17:21:47 UTC
Ah, yes, it was Buerk I was thinking of.

Then again, if you read his autobiography, it's clear that one of the less reconstructed things about his personality is his approach to women.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up