apologies

Feb 20, 2004 00:27

for being too dim to make the lj cut work. It was supposed to say "rant on credibility".

Leave a comment

Comments 6

thiebes February 20 2004, 01:18:00 UTC
You can edit after the fact by clicking the little pencil icon.

What was the context which your thoughts arose in? It seemed like you were continuing a discussion or something?

Reply

Re: juliakstone February 20 2004, 08:20:50 UTC
Pencil icon! Thanks! I wanted to edit after the fact but I was far too tired at that point to even try hard.

Explaining the source better was one of the things I wanted to edit in after I posted the fool thing and then went, wait, too much information is missing here... Yes, I was continuing a discussion. Which I waded unto after Laiadapila posted part of it (under the heading "Wow. (OTO filter again)".

Reply

thiebes February 20 2004, 08:32:33 UTC
Ah. I can't see the post because I am not on her friends list. Ah well!

Reply


intralimina February 20 2004, 01:42:22 UTC

what you want is ( rant on credibility )

Reply

Re: intralimina February 20 2004, 01:43:34 UTC

wow. that was weird. it shouldn't have parsed that closing tag... take the spaces out, and this is how the closing tag should read: < / lj - cut >

Reply

Re: juliakstone February 20 2004, 08:22:13 UTC
That is exactly what I was trying to do. It's nice to know I was in the right ball park. I've made it work before, but not the last couple times.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up