Comments | justbenny2k: (без темы)

justbenny2k

(Untitled)

Mar 05, 2006 10:37

Comments 8

ifferjenn March 5 2006, 16:37:50 UTC

My only question in this case...HOW does he honestly think this is a good idea?? As in, an idea that will actually work in the real world? At least, the Real World, USA? I can see it being a novel thing for, like, a week TOPS, but how can you honestly provide NO birth control options at all? There are other reasons women need hormone-controlling bc pills, aside from the whole no-offspring thing.

hanover March 5 2006, 16:46:37 UTC

It says he no longer owns Dominos. Not sure what boycotting a company this guy doesnt own will do. :)

justbenny2k March 7 2006, 12:47:27 UTC

Do you think he's not drawing on the stocks?

estrange March 5 2006, 17:00:50 UTC

That is about the weirdest thing I've ever heard. It's like that one Mel Gibson show - I forget the name.

andrew_jp_reyes March 5 2006, 17:09:11 UTC

Old news. He already made his billions off of domino's. Boycotting them now won't affect things.

justbenny2k March 7 2006, 12:47:55 UTC

Stocks. Loss in stocks mean a loss in his pockets.

genixbear March 5 2006, 18:55:53 UTC

They honestly can't enforce any of the supposed restrictions. If any of the properties are advertised in local or regional media, then the housing discrimation act would come into effect. So if me and my bf wanted to move in and could afford the property and secure financing, they would have to sell us the house or have a valid excuse for removing the property from the market, not related to the actual lifestyle or personal information. I don't honestly see any realtors attaching themsleves to this, because there is a high level of possible litigation, as well as the possibly of losing thier license.

I do however find this very alarming, but have no doubt that it will not happen.