top commenters

Jun 21, 2006 14:12

I should be doing the dishes, but instead I'm eating pizza and faffing on lj. Now I've never done this before, but then I always feel pretty shitty about how bad I am at commenting on other people's journals and I wanted to know which people I should be licking for being so lovely ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 44

liadlaith June 21 2006, 13:45:37 UTC
Good lord, I may be third but Minnow is miles ahead of any of us. I had better post more, as Scoradh is gaining on me!

Reply

kabeyk June 21 2006, 13:56:05 UTC
Aw, you're another person I don't get to talk to much anymore because of work things.x Heh, you've got a while before Scoradh catches up, I think.

Reply

liadlaith June 21 2006, 14:05:44 UTC
Yeah, I've kind of dropped out of fandom now, very much a lurker. It's shame, but I guess it's just how things go sometimes : / Stupid work. Stupid needing money to travel. Rah.

Reply

kabeyk June 21 2006, 14:15:09 UTC
I know, it sucks so much. Don't worry, when we're famous it'll all work out. Or something.

Reply


beckaandzac June 21 2006, 14:12:15 UTC
Ooh, I'm in the top ten! I had no idea I spouted inanities at you so often ;)

Reply

kabeyk June 21 2006, 14:16:09 UTC
Hee, well you must do! Love.x

Reply

beckaandzac June 21 2006, 14:45:20 UTC
Alas I can't use this, as I have a Mac. Unless I steal my dad's computer, but then he might wonder what this "livejournal" business is about, and then, well, there's the porn...

Anyway, your comments about Nutella were much appreciated. It seems a crime not to lick the knife properly afterwards. They should write that on the container.

Reply

kabeyk June 21 2006, 14:49:13 UTC
I think there's a mac version linked from the entry on the person's journal, actually, if you want to try it.

Yeah, there should be a warning to mind your tongue on the sharp bit.

Reply


Okay, here comes 1103... minnow_53 June 21 2006, 14:36:01 UTC
Wow! I wish I could comment on my own journal so extensively! :D I know I talk a lot but this is ridiculous. Not sure whether to be happy or alarmed, really. *confused*

^_^xx

Reply

Oh, and 1104, because 4 worries me a bit. minnow_53 June 21 2006, 14:41:22 UTC
I miss our chats too! We used to be very erudite, discussing canon and writing and so on. It was great!

I assume the CQ journal is the Snape one? *still a bit confused*

^_^xx

Reply

Re: Oh, and 1104, because 4 worries me a bit. kabeyk June 21 2006, 14:46:56 UTC
Well I missed my own comments off, as well as anonymous ones - why would anyone be interested in that, I dunno.

Yeah, we had dead clever canon discussions about Remus' hair and why Remus and Sirius and James definitely had hot three-way action every time Peter wasn't in the room. I do miss that.x

Nah, it's wassername. Cho. I think you couldn't be bothered to log out of her journal one time, because I have about ten comments from her.

kxx

Reply

Re: Oh, and 1104, because 4 worries me a bit. minnow_53 June 21 2006, 15:00:36 UTC
It would be interesting to know how many you'd done, though. :) Anonymous would be quite interesting too. One of my f-list always comments anonymously: I mean, she signs her name, but she isn't logged in that often. So it's not technically anonymous, of course.

Oh, I added up wrong, as usual. It was 5, not four. Must stop doing that.

Hey, I always said Peter was included.

I remember the Cho thing vaguely now. I don't do CQ any more, but the journals are useful to keep when I want to try out new layouts without buggering my own journal too much! You can use sockdave for that, of course. His layout really sucks: couldn't he have a nice one?

^_^xx

Reply


shaggydogstail June 21 2006, 14:37:40 UTC
Oh.

Reply

shaggydogstail June 21 2006, 14:38:00 UTC
Okay

Reply

shaggydogstail June 21 2006, 14:38:14 UTC
Then.

Reply

shaggydogstail June 21 2006, 14:39:27 UTC
Hurrah!

That sounds worryingly dirty.

You say that likes it's a bad thing.

I was quite upset to see that I'd failed to make the top ten actually. Woe!

Reply


_emeraldgreen June 21 2006, 15:38:30 UTC
Ooh! *dances* And I totally want to be in your pervy hierarchy. What, it didn't say pervy...?

Reply

kabeyk June 22 2006, 20:34:22 UTC
The perve-factor can be assumed to be very high indeed.x

Reply


Leave a comment

Up