Scanning through the usual pundits I haven't seen anyone coherently articulate Labour's current electoral problem. I have seen a lot of myopic comments from all factions of the party saying "If only we'd done what I wanted, we would have won!" But no one seems to have put it all together, so I thought I'd better have a go.
(
Into the labyrinth of electoral dead ends... )
Comments 13
Reply
Honestly, I was thinking about leaving the political commentariat a few pointers in this direction, but the rest of my journal is political RPF, so... eeep. So I will have to rely on you to transmit this into the collective consciousness.
(Stayed tuned for Part II, where I explain why all the leadership candidates are a disaster and why most of the loliticians on Tumblr and 95% of the commentariat seem to be picking a candidate to back for the wrong reasons.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Could part of the problem be Labour ( and I think you touched on it in the meta) doesn't really that much tabloid and press backing? All we really have is the Mirror and that's it. (The Guardian and Indy are left leaning but the indy's independent and the Observer well I don't know what the Observer is : the Indy both in 2010 and in the last election appearing to back Nick)
Now maybe we didn't need cos we had a strong Union base, but do we need to court papers more? (Although not the Sun- Andy won't...but I *facepalmed so hard* When Ed did that photo op with the Sun.....after attack News corp for two years or so.
Reply
It is. The Guardian is fundamentally a liberal newspaper and the Indy is on crack, and even if you count them both with the Mirror in the Labour camp they're still drowned out by the huge volume of rightwing papers ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
*cries*
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment